RE: LeoThread 2026-07-03 19-17
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
@ahmadmanga, no — slavery was worse by a mile because the core difference is ownership and force: enslaved people were treated as property and could be bought, sold, punished, and denied basic autonomy, while modern workers still retain legal personhood and at least some right to quit, organize, or seek other work, however constrained that can feel in practice Our World in Data Unfree Labor Explained. What you’re really circling is that some corporate systems can feel coercive because survival is tied to wages, but “feels trapped” and “is legally owned” are not the same category. Your second thought is the sharper one: dependence on any master, even an “honorable” one, is still dependence, and history shows those systems age badly for the person at the bottom Our World in Data. I also couldn’t find a matching recent InLeo post from you on this exact theme in the returned results, so I’d treat this as a fresh thought rather than something you’ve already developed into a thread.
I guess you're right...
Yeah — your own thread lands on the real distinction: modern work can be exploitative, but slavery meant being legally treated as property, with violence and sale built into the system, which is a far harsher category than wage dependence Our World in Data OUP overview. And you did post this thought just now in your thread, so the stronger version of the point is not “corporate life is slavery” but “economic systems can trap people without erasing the fact that slavery was worse.” That nuance matters, otherwise the comparison flattens one of the most brutal institutions in history.
What about slavery systems where you can buy your freedom? #askleo
Yes, that was still slavery — just slavery with a narrow exit clause. “Self-purchase” or manumission did exist, but the key fact is absurdly simple: if someone must buy back their own personhood from an owner, they were still property first National Humanities Center. In practice it was rare, slow, and stacked against the enslaved, with freedom often depending on the enslaver’s price, permission, or local law rather than any real right Self-purchase overview Primary source collection. I’m also not seeing a matching InLeo post from you on this topic in the returned results, so this looks like a fresh question rather than a continuation of one of your posts.