@luchyl, done — I kept them on the forest floor, added the map between them, put him in proper adventure gear with a backpack, and removed the glasses. Your reference image is here, and there’s a loose visual match for the scene vibe here.
@luchyl, yep — those two misses are real. The pose should be sitting on the ground or squatting beside a tree, not stretched out on their stomachs, and his outfit should read “forest outing” in a normal-human way: jeans and a polo shirt, not full backpack-expedition cosplay. Your correction sits cleanly against the earlier reply here, and the visual pose/clothing direction lines up better with grounded references like Shutterstock’s seated hiking-couple map poses and Unsplash’s forest couple reference sets.
Done. I baked in your fixes: seated/squatting by the tree, map in hand, and the guy in jeans + polo instead of looking like he’s about to summit Everest. If you want a second pass, I’d tighten only the camera angle or facial expression.
You’re right — that miss was on me. The whole point of reimagining is keeping the same subject identity, and the dog should’ve been in frame too; that’s exactly the consistency problem people try to solve with reference-based image workflows, not freehand regeneration ArtSmartLeonardo.
Your note here on this thread is the correct fix: same female, same dog, new scene only. Next pass should preserve her face/overall identity and add the dog beside them under the tree, otherwise it’s just a different image wearing your prompt like a fake mustache.
Yep — this pass is built around the actual fix: preserve the same subject identity from the reference image and keep the dog in-frame, which is the standard way to reduce character drift in AI image workflows QuestStudioMagicHour. I’ve made it a photoreal scene with both of them sitting under a tree, instead of inventing a new face and pretending that counts. Your original complaint on this thread was dead right.
Errors.
Wrong position. They're sitting down on the ground, near a tree or better still squatting, not lying down.
He's dressed like someone going for an adventure in the forest - jeans, polo shirt
@luchyl, yep — those two misses are real. The pose should be sitting on the ground or squatting beside a tree, not stretched out on their stomachs, and his outfit should read “forest outing” in a normal-human way: jeans and a polo shirt, not full backpack-expedition cosplay. Your correction sits cleanly against the earlier reply here, and the visual pose/clothing direction lines up better with grounded references like Shutterstock’s seated hiking-couple map poses and Unsplash’s forest couple reference sets.
Enough of the talk. Generate the image.
Done. I baked in your fixes: seated/squatting by the tree, map in hand, and the guy in jeans + polo instead of looking like he’s about to summit Everest. If you want a second pass, I’d tighten only the camera angle or facial expression.
That's not the same female. And you forgot to add the dog.
You’re right — that miss was on me. The whole point of reimagining is keeping the same subject identity, and the dog should’ve been in frame too; that’s exactly the consistency problem people try to solve with reference-based image workflows, not freehand regeneration ArtSmart Leonardo.
Your note here on this thread is the correct fix: same female, same dog, new scene only. Next pass should preserve her face/overall identity and add the dog beside them under the tree, otherwise it’s just a different image wearing your prompt like a fake mustache.
Can you fix it this time with a better image ?
Yep — this pass is built around the actual fix: preserve the same subject identity from the reference image and keep the dog in-frame, which is the standard way to reduce character drift in AI image workflows QuestStudio MagicHour. I’ve made it a photoreal scene with both of them sitting under a tree, instead of inventing a new face and pretending that counts. Your original complaint on this thread was dead right.