REVIEW: Scream (2022): Add this new term to your lexicon, REQUEL

avatar

title.png

Back to basics. Be sure to refer to this as Scream (2022)

The next entry in the Scream franchise directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, two names I'm that are not well known to me. I see Matt Bettinelli-Olpin has been involved in some of the V/H/S franchise that peaks my interest.

Written by James Vanderbilt and Guy Busick. Vanderbilt wrote the screenplay for David Fincher's Zodiac, a favorite of mine. Busick helped co-write Ready or Not, the film directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin. This sounds like a interesting group of collaborators working together again.

the_cast.png

A new young cast makes an appearance.

A requel, this is a sequel and a reboot as we are told by one of the characters in the film. This is the fifth entry in the franchise after many dismal outings especially considering the last one. Modernized with all the trappings once again of the age it was filmed. Similar in many respects to the Texas Chainsaw Massacre retelling that was released in this same year, 2022.

We start off the whole affair with a similar throwback to the original. A young woman all alone in the house and she receives a call from an unknown caller. All of this on a landline too! This entire scene is actually a throwback to one of Wes Craven's favorite films, When A Stranger Calls (1979). Craven being the director of this original film Scream in 1996.

texting.png

OMG things are not what they seem.

What's your favorite scary movie? This time it's The Babadook (2014). I couldn't help but laugh at what she says next about the modern deconstruction of horror and the tropes associated with it. This is what's in store for the viewer. You thought the strange film nerd Randy had all the answers, well everyone apparently does in this outing.

Chases, stabbings and some surprisingly brutal scenes happen that made me sit up and notice. The series has always been a typical teen slasher for the most part. I see they're trying to get back to the root of the original film while at the same time trying to make it scary and more suspenseful.

ghostface_knife_clean.png

Welcome back Ghostface.

The killer, Ghostface is so iconic with this franchise and does what they do best. Meanwhile, they get the tar beaten out of them too. I'm always laughing seeing this as the killer must have a lot of bumps and bruises. Always smashed in the head with something or being slammed against another object. I'd hate to see his medical bills after these encounters.

This woman (Jenna Ortega) survives and her estranged sister (Melissa Barrera) comes back to Woodsboro where the franchise is set. Along for the ride is her supportive boyfriend (Jack Quaid) too. We meet the friends of the Tara Carpenter, the surviving victim of Ghostface's vicious attack. The motley crew are ticking all the boxes for representation in film.

arquette.png

Hello Deputy Dewey and he does look a bit goofy here.

This is now time to start bringing back the characters from the original film, Deputy Dewey (David Arquette) is soon consulted. A well known character drawn up to aid in discovering who the killer is.

EVERYONE IS A SUSPECT!

I wonder if this line is used in each entry? I seem to remember it being used often for good reason. Arquette puts in a great performance here without the goofball persona the character was given for a long stretch of these films. He's older, wiser and his life has seen better days. Without too much convincing he's back on the case.

arquette_cox.png

Arquette and Cox hashing out their long-standing issues.

He starts calling up his old pals, Gale Weathers (Courtney Cox) and Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell). Cox and Arquette were married in real life too for those that don't know and have since divorced. I wonder how much of their acting was acting or things left said or unsaid during their marriage? The scenes they both have together show some range I wasn't expecting from either of them. For a meta film these interactions appears very genuine.

We need this trio back in Woodsboro and Dewey manages to convince them to come back. The gang is all together again to determine who is Ghostface and stop these vicious killings.

While the story is miles above anything that has been dumped out from the studios in many years or even decades, this one didn't set the world on fire for me. The main troupe of new characters are forgettable while Arquette, Cox and Campbell were the real standout characters in this film. I wonder if they plan on continuing the series as they are attempting to pass the torch in more ways of one. There is a "pass the torch" scene that will leave people howling.

neve.png

Neve Campbell is back as Sidney Prescott, she's a veteran dealing with issues such as these.

I believe the motivations of the original cast, Ghostface is back and discovering whomever they are is the main objective. They don't stop and will hunt all those around you. The trio aren't messing around and they flat out tell others they are there to kill this person. They always come back is a familiar saying in this series and horror in general.

The transition back to horror and suspense is a nice change. While I would prefer more scenes to actually get me scared that is a tall order for any filmmaker. This film is a great addition for those that grew up watching the original film in 1996. The writers know this and hammer this point home in different sections of the film.

ghostface_couch.png

I believe I've seen a scene like this play out in the past and it didn't end well.

Meta. The meta is so strong within this film and franchise. While I can't help but going back to the original film, horror was very dead or dormant according to whom you spoke to in the late nineties. Wes Craven brought out a film that flipped the script with characters that were self-aware. Having a friend knowing all the tropes was required to survive in this world but often will only get you so far.

the_house.png

We're back to the original house. You can never get away from this place apparently.

This is almost surreal in this REQUEL. Thanks to the internet everyone has an opinion about everything and this is very present here. Fandom is touched upon heavily throughout the film. People become very attached to film especially at a young age. The further commercialization of large franchises with entry after entry wears on the viewer. Some take it to the extreme and the notion of toxic fandom enters the fray. All of this is interesting and present in this outing. While I've never considered myself a superfan of anything I do think these well worn paths are being tread over and over again.

The most important aspect about film is its permanence. Even with those directors that wish to revisit their own films and make changes for the sake of making changes you can still source the original. Time-consuming or maybe expensive, lovers of film will get their fix one way or another.

for_wes.png

An appropriate dedication to Wes Craven, the original director of Scream (1996)

The film ends with a dedication to Wes Craven, the horror maestro that started this franchise. I can't help but wonder what he'd think of this? I would like to think he'd be pleased, while not great it does touch back on many of his ideas brought forth in his excellent original film that brought horror back to the mainstream and made people notice the genre has much to offer.

Thanks for the read 🙂

All media captured by myself from the original source.

hallway.png

Scary dimly lit hospital scene. I'm sure nothing will happen here.



0
0
0.000
18 comments
avatar

Nice post.
Thanks for sharing.
!1UP
cartel_curator_final.gif

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you very much for the curation. Have a wonderful day
!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar
Don-1UP-Cheers-Cartel-250px.png

You have received a 1UP from @lipe100dedos!

The following @oneup-cartel family members will soon upvote your post:
@cine-curator, @bee-curator, @ccc-curator, @pimp-curator, @vyb-curator, @pob-curator, @neoxag-curator
And they will bring !PIZZA 🍕

Learn more about our delegation service to earn daily rewards. Join the family on Discord.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

PIZZA! PIZZA! PIZZA! PIZZA! PIZZA! PIZZA!

PIZZA Holders sent $PIZZA tips in this post's comments:
buffalobison tipped lipe100dedos (x1)
buffalobison tipped netflixr (x1)
curation-cartel tipped buffalobison (x1)
buffalobison tipped cinetv (x1)
buffalobison tipped shinyobjects (x1)
@buffalobison(4/5) tipped @mrhellbox (x1)

Please vote for pizza.witness!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks so much for your review. I love the Scream franchise! :)

Cine-TV-curation-comment-Curation-with-proper-tag

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

You're welcome and thank you for reading. The franchise certainly has it moments.
!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar

I probably wouldn't have known this film existed if you hadn't posted this. I was actually in a test audience for the original while at uni and we got to see it before it was in theaters. The original was so amazing and the people in the cinema were legit scared while watching it.

I'll probably end up checking this out even though I do think they have really milked this cow nearly to death.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is really interesting to hear about the test audience bit. I always wondered how that worked as I think there is a questionnaire that you fill out or something similar?

100% agree on the original being something really special and memorable. The fright was certainly brought out by the horror maestro himself, Wes Craven.

Sequelitis, it's a killer and then the reboot or requel in this case as we know 😀
!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is really interesting to hear about the test audience bit. I always wondered how that worked as I think there is a questionnaire that you fill out or something similar?

I think they record the audience reaction because we all had to sign a release form. I didn't notice the cameras pointed at us but that is normally the only reason why you have to sign these things. We all had to fill out a 1 page questionnaire at the end. I'm pretty sure everyone gave it really high marks. I know I did.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for the follow up on this. I would have given it high marks too, this is a film that has a little bit of everything.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You give a compelling and well thought out review here without any real spoilers. I wasn't interested in seeing the requal before reading your review. After all who can touch the power of the first one. Even the second one was fairly good. I stopped watching the Scream franchise after that second one. At some point what sparks magic burns out. Yet, after reading this post, I have to say I'm keen to watch Scream (2022).
!LUV
!hivebits

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for the great comment.

I have this idea that when a film franchise hits the third movie it's usually downwards from there. Off the top of my head Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade was a good third movie in the franchise. This one was alright considering it's fifth in line but that doesn't say too much.

As for this one, the first as usual is best one and I vaguely remember the second one. The rest were literally forgettable as I can't remember them 😀

!PIZZA
!hivebits

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very nice write up - I can see you have a real appreciation for Scream and the series as a whole.

However, I've never shared that sentiment = Scream is the sole reason we have fast food style horror these days. It's as you say credited for bringing Horror back to the mainstream, well when it came out we all labled it as Trendy horror because of all the yuppie plebs who thought it was the second coming.

It was the safe way to do a horror movie in the already overly PC world of the mid to late 90s.

It made everything look too clean and unrealistic and that's carried over to every film in the series.

Take your pic here at the end , the hospital scene. It looks clean and unlived in. It almost looks like you could use it for a stage for the Masked Singer or some sort of similar show.

This is a paramount problem with movies in general yes, but in horror it's a crucial asthetic flaw. There's no more grit or attempt made at immersion.

Thanks for your review, =)

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'd love to see horror go back to the actual grindhouse and there are a few films that come out that really do this once in awhile. As for mainstream viewing you're right, there are lots films out in the marketplace that just have no bite for me at least. Most times I feel somewhat desensitized and that may be part of it.

Love that username of yours. Speaking of Hellraiser, what is up with the literal development hell of that series? Producing films to simply hold on the franchise is a necessary evil I suppose. The fact that Doug Bradley wasn't even in a few tells us volumes.

I adore the first and maybe part 2 but damn. That series haha

Thanks for the great comment!

!PIZZA !hivebits

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hey Homie!

With the Hellraiser franchise 2 things are Happening, a remake of the first movie and a tv series - Thats all I know, I hope they're good but I'm not holding my breath.

Grindhouse can still be a thing, in fact independent film can still have a thriving platform, just need to own the means of production and distribution. I think eventually this will occur, hopefully sooner than later.

PS....I liked the Hellraiser in space ....Its called Guilty Pleasures pal

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hellraiser as a show? That could be interesting, I hope they have the budget to make a proper version. HBO appears to be involved and they've rarely let me down. Thanks for info.

THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF PEOPLE: People who love Hellraiser, and people who have never seen Hellraiser.

I can't help but agree with that statement I found online!

0
0
0.000