RE: Why Technology Hasn't Taken Over And The Future
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I think a big difference is autopilot on a plane is pretty hazard-free, relatively speaking. There aren't thousands of datapoints per second coming at you from all angles. In the sky you are heading in the correct direction, correct speed, altitude etc. so the variables are much different. Still an amazing feat of technology and programming though, considering when it was implemented!
I think we just have to be careful who controls the AI. There are a lot of nefarious things that people like Gates, Soros and others do with regular people never mind if they have highly advanced AI at their fingertips.
0
0
0.000
I agree with your explanation of the difference between plane and car autopilot. If we can lessen the variables that cars need to process, that would also be helpful. An overpass can be helpful to limit humans crossing the road. A full replacement of cars to autonomous ones, can help limit driver related issues.
Policing AI usage is definitely something that needs some focus on. We don't want Skynet to become a reality.
See that’s where I fully disagree with you - I am not signing up for fully autonomous cars everywhere. If people want to buy them go ahead but everyone losing their ability to drive for any “greater good” is the absolute opposite. It eviscerates freedom of movement for people who have had the joy of that for the last 80 years or so. Don’t have the latest medical intervention? Sorry your car won’t work because you don’t have a steering wheel and the navigation is locked. That’s not a world I’m signing up for.
By the datapoints I am also meaning what these cars have already seen. Simply people walking around messes them up. Putting one of those self driving cars in rush hour street traffic in a big city like New York, Miami, Houston and you have hundreds of people walking around, crossing streets and lots of other things going on. It’s much different than a plane, and something they may eventually get better but it’s highly complex environmentally.
I guess you missed the part where I said to limit the people walking across the street. I can understand your reasons against autonomy. The simple solution will be to have manual lanes and auto lanes. I don't get the medical intervention part. I think that will happen to the manual driven cars instead of the auto ones.
What happened in Canada - they locked people out of their bank accounts and froze their assets because the truckers were protesting mandatory experimental injections to move about freely. If you think that is not going to continue to happen unless people collectively say NO then I hope you figure that out! I don’t try to spread doom and fear porn but this is their playbook. Mandatory medical interventions and if you don’t like it you get your freedoms taken away one by one.
Granted that’s if all of their dystopian ideas come true - I don’t think they will but that’s only because millions of people are rejecting their agendas.
Auto and manual lanes would make sense - kind of like the high occupancy vehicle lanes that many large American cities do for people commuting in. I just think the auto lanes would need to be protected so that it’s consistent and free of distractions.
Oh, that is next level type of control, and something I don't support. I don't even understand why they force it if it's just experimental.
Without a doubt. The control is the key.
The control is what they are vying to get as much and quickly as possible.