RE: Reporte de curación de Chess Brothers para el día 01/09/2026
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Where is the doubt? You ignore other accounts that post multiple times a day.
You are the only ones posting repeated templates (copy-paste) multiple times a day, along with another one out there that I also downvote. I haven't seen those accounts you're referring to. As for the other ones I've seen posting several times a day, it isn't duplicate content.
Our content curation reports have been a blog tradition for five years, and we won't remove them without reason.
I know that—I've been seeing your posts for years—but while doing curation this year, I came across 3 posts on the same day, and that alarmed me.
Daily curation reports that lack original content are spam—most of the ones on Hive are—but they have been normalized, and I'm not going to swim against the stream, even if this practice is unethical. However, accepting more than one a day with such high rewards is just excessive farming. Disagreement over rewards has always existed on Hive, and that is precisely what we are applying here.
thank you for the suggestion; we will keep it in mind along with our usual original content
I can hold you to this then. I hope to see original content and not copy-paste. You could explain why you voted for each post, what you found interesting about it, so creators can learn creation criteria and improve their posts. That would actually bring real value to the community.
Ok. As we've already stated, we do NOT post 2 or 3 times daily as a rule. Whenever you see that, it's an EXCEPTION. This is easily verifiable by looking at our weekly average of about 7 posts (the equivalent of one post a day). @stayoutoftherz previously pointed this out as well, so don't worry about our posting frequency, because it is balanced and well within fair use.
Regarding rewards, you're right that there has never been a single consensus on Hive that satisfies everyone. However, many who support us are familiar with our initiatives both ON and OFF the platform, and upvoting is simply their way of showing appreciation. Others support us because they trust our vision and want to grow alongside us through our delegation program.
We appreciate your feedback and are open to tweaking and expanding our content. In fact, we've already started doing so by sharing highlights from our English conversational club.
That said, we will keep publishing our daily curation reports (including occasional delayed ones when necessary) alongside any extra content we find value in sharing. We have full autonomy over how we run our blog, and our posts fully comply with platform guidelines while harming no one.
Thanks for your feedback.
Really? What would he think if there were a Hive curation project with this kind of activity:
A total of 17 reports in 7 days, which is significantly more than our 7 posts over the same period.
An average of 2.42 reports per day, far exceeding his "standard" of one report per day.
Posting up to THREE and FIVE times in a single day, far exceeding the "alarm" he expressed over us.
Post rewards far higher than ours, totaling approximately $106 in one week.
Yet interestingly, he hasn't downvoted a single one of their posts, nor has he made "complaints" and accusations and used his project account to fuel the fire, even though, by his own logic, they use the exact same template daily, post multiple times a day, self-vote, and therefore are "abusing" the system.
And this is just one example. Should we tell that project that this user disagrees with them and that, from now on, they will give them downvotes?
I wonder why his moral crusade falls short when a curation project is this large instead of small like ours. I also wonder what we'd uncover if we started digging into the history of the project he claims to represent.