A Trip Around Toyohashi Station ~ Photowalk Japan

avatar



cldwck0mq001n8gszgecue4bj_IMG_1532.webp
Curiouser and curiouser
cldwck0y0001taysz2hq56huo_IMG_1530.webp
Looks like he caught me!
cldwck6id002a50sza8j4gsqc_IMG_1537.webp
Trains coming... but which way is it coming?
cldwck7co001m3ksz2g9xadui_IMG_1538.webp
There she goes!
cldwcka8s001x0iszb38mead9_IMG_1528.webp
Pit of despair?
cldwckbr5002415szhadzeicz_IMG_1540.webp
Follow the yellow line
cldwckg6y00218psze34e1i32_IMG_1543.webp
Either looking for food or a place to poop
cldwckhp300217zsz2ynw64ff_IMG_1527.webp
'Tis some kind of secret code
cldwckmjh001y79sz2zu8gtt8_IMG_1554.webp
I think there must be a glitch in the matrix
cldwckrtk001ca8sz2f4417qo_IMG_1611.webp
Yeah, definitely a glitch in the matrix

The great thing about smartphone photography is we can take them anywhere, even to non-photography jobs. I was headed off to a translation project with a car company here. I can't take a camera with me there. Car companies in this country are super-private and they would completely freak out if I tried to bring a camera inside. As it is, I have to turn my smartphone in at the security office before entering. But at least I can safely bring it and trust the security office isn't going to damage it.

So anyway, it's nice to have a smartphone that can let me take photos of my trip. I opted for Hipstamatic for this trip. Long time followers will know I adore Hipstamatic for the toy camera analog images it gives. It reminds me of my Holga back in my film days. One of these days I'll get my Holga out of storage in my parent's house and start using it again. Until then, this is a pretty good substitute.

I let Hipstamatic pick a random filters combination for me on this trip. It used Salvador 84 lens and Blanko Noir film. If you don't know, in Hipstamatic you combine a "lens" and a "film". They are really just two different filters, but the "film" filter usually has some scratches or grain or light noise—things you'd have to deal with on real analog film—and the "lens" usually adjusts sharpness, often opting for that softer film look or even going for the plastic lens toy camera look. The analog camera metaphor is kind of silly, but it works for me.

Anyway, this isn't my favorite combination. I don't really like the colors. When I do use the Salvador 84 lens, I usually opt for a monochrome film to get rid of the ugly colors it gives. That said, I like to sometimes use something different so I went with it this time when the random engine gave it to me.

The colors the Salvador lens gives I don't like, but the mirror effect I do, that is it mirrors the image up and down or left and right randomly or sometimes in a random pattern. This can create some cool effects. I also used the double exposure function of Hipstamatic sometimes. This is where you take one photo and then take another "on top of" the previous exposure. I could never get any good double-exposures in my film days, but Hipstamatic has given me some nice ones.

You can probably follow along most of those photos, so not much comment is needed, but I will give a few brief thoughts.

  • I like the mirror effect I got when I was following after the woman. The diagonal mirror effect given when I was following the man who looked behind at me was also cool, though not as neat as the other.

  • That yellow line also came in an interesting way. That bumpy strip is used for blind people to follow along.

  • One of the photos of the street I added a tilt-shift effect just for fun. I might have gone too far with the saturation because the background kind of overwhelms the cars, but I think it still looks ok. I don't own a tilt-shift lens for my dSLR but I have used one before. They are fun, but not fun enough for me to buy one, especially when you can get something close in software. That track down the middle of the street is the tram. That tram is really nice and always makes me wish more cities would use them instead of sending us down in a subway.

  • There are hundreds of pigeons at this station. For some reason the station doesn't try to stop people from feeding them, so they just keep coming back looking for more handouts. Amusing at times, annoying at other times. But they do make good subjects for photography.

  • I included two shots with different filters, that bit of graffiti and the mysterious hole. It's actually a disposal for pet bottles, though lots of people cheat and throw regular trash down there too.

Anyway, that's all. Hope you enjoyed this train station photowalk.

Hi there! David LaSpina is an American photographer and translator lost in Japan, trying to capture the beauty of this country one photo at a time and searching for the perfect haiku.

For the best experience view this post on Liketu



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

I like the toy effect a lot. I used to have a camera that had that as a setting back in the day. I miss it. I tend to take photos and not edit them although might bring the contrast or shadows up here and there depending on the photo. I don't use editing software, just google photos...I'm a simple man. Lol.

0
0
0.000
avatar

In that case, if you have an iPhone you might enjoy Hipstamatic. It is the only of these analog photo apps that I really enjoy.

I hear you on editing. I do edit a lot when I have to. When I get a photo gig I pretty much have to edit those in some way. But for my personal photos, I usually edit as little as possible.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I much prefer letting my photos be, meaning be what they are out of the camera like in the old days. I don't get excited when I see photos that have been heavily edited to look perfect, they're no longer photos I guess.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The best photos in the old days were still were edited quite a bit. Ansel Adams would spend days in the darkroom on a single print to get it perfect. But I think that right there is the difference between then and now. In the film days you really had to know your stuff to edit an image and you had to take time to do it. Now you can just do it instantly in Photoshop. Few people then take the time to really master that. There's also the fact that film still has a much higher resolution than all but the best digital cameras. And Ansel Adams... dude worked with large format, which gave him a resolution we can't even get close to in digital. I think that lack of resolution makes a lot of digital edits look bad, just because there isn't as much to work with, so you end up filling in the gaps with painting and the end result looks fake.

Back in my film days I tried all the old techniques for editing. They are tough to get right! So I quickly adopted the saying "Get it right in camera". And I still try to do that.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, I know but there's a difference between clicking the bandaid tool and spending hours in the dark room.

I'm no photographer and don't get off on photos either way really, it was just a point. A person taking a shit photo and making it look good on Photoshop doesn't impress me, it's still a shit photo and there's no real photography skill involved...yet they call themselves photographers when all they are doing is using software to get the result.

My grandfather was a photographer, no editing software, just light, the camera and his dark room. That's what I respect.

0
0
0.000
avatar

A person taking a shit photo and making it look good on Photoshop doesn't impress me, it's still a shit photo and there's no real photography skill involved...yet they call themselves photographers when all they are doing is using software to get the result.

Absolutely! Completely agreed. I see this so often in my photography circles.

There is a certain kind of "photographer" on the rise who takes images from Google maps street view, processes them to try to make them look artsy, then calls them their own. It's madness

My grandfather was a photographer, no editing software, just light, the camera and his dark room. That's what I respect.

Total respect for that. Those film guys really knew their stuff.

0
0
0.000