Randumb Ramble: Social Media and the "Right" to Privacy... WTF?

avatar

As you know by now, I'm a little "slow" in the uptake, sometimes.

One of the great "mysteries" that has baffled me for better than 20 years is this notion of "privacy" and "anonymity" in social media.

X312-Nasturtium.jpg

Color me stupid, but if you're a "privacy hound," obsessed with not divulging who you are, and now wanting anyone to know anything about you... WHY exactly are you participating in SOCIAL media which is (essentially) centered around sharing everything about yourself with the entire world?

Could be that I am missing the point, but from here that sounds most of all like what you really want is the "freedom" to be a troll without any consequences!

Maybe that sounds a bit overboard, but there's something about the juxtaposition of wanting to be extremely outspoken... but ONLY if nobody knows who you are... that reeks of a certain flavor of "intellectual cowardice."

0336-BusyBee.JPG

It's SOCIETY, Stupid!

"Come on! You know perfectly well that there are a lot of things that are outright DANGEROUS to talk about!"

Yes, I'm well aware of that... and of course part of the problem we face here is that we live in a world where "speaking your truth" can actually be dangerous. What kind of world is this, that differing opinions cannot coexist? And I'm definitely not talking about people who are part of the Witness Protection Program and such!

So, the call for privacy.

And yet? That same call for privacy is really a double-edged sword because you're afforded anonymity from which to disseminate your particular thought platform... are you not really asking for a "safe space" in which to have "opinions without consequences," and hence being given a free pass from having to be personally accountable for the sounds coming out of your face?

0272-Clouds.jpg

I Want to HAVE my Cake and EAT it, Too!

Well, don't we all?

When I look out across my list of friends and contacts from the past 30 years or so, it seems to me there are two distinctly different kinds of privacy hounds out there.

The ones who are privacy hounds "in name only," and the ones who actually are very protective about their privacy.

The ones who really don't want you to know who and where they are? They are effectively invisible, and they are certainly nowhere near Facebook, twitter, Instagram or any other kind of social media.

There are no photos, no links, no profiles... and their names don't even come up in any online searches, except maybe as a third-party mention (Betty Sue Anderson was one of the guests at my wedding).

0441-Daisies.JPG

I have at least three old friends like that... they simply do not exist on the web, unless you're subscribed to one of those legal databases you have to pay $24.95 per inquiry for, and all you'll get is an address and possibly a phone number.

If what you really want is actual privacy, that's what you do.

But wanting "to be part of the game" but not be subject to the general way the game WORKS? I just can't get that to make sense.

But then again, there's nothing "common" about sense!

Thanks for reading, and have a great remainder of your week!

How about YOU? What do YOU think "privacy" really means? Does SOCIAL media and PRIVACY sound like a bit of a contradiction? If you have chosen to be active on social media, haven't you pretty much GIVEN UP your privacy? Comments, feedback and other interaction is invited and welcomed! Because — after all — SOCIAL content is about interacting, right? Leave a comment — share your experiences — be part of the conversation!

HivePanda.gif


Greetings bloggers and social content creators! This article was created via PeakD, a blogging application that's part of the Hive Social Content Experience. If you're a blogger, writer, poet, artist, vlogger, musician or other creative content wizard, come join us! Hive is a little "different" because it's not run by a "company;" it operates via the consensus of its users and your content can't be banned, censored, taken down or demonetized. And that COUNTS for something, in these uncertain times! So if you're ready for the next generation of social content where YOU retain ownership and control, come by and learn about Hive and make an account!

Proud member of the Silver Bloggers Community on Hive! Silverbloggers Logo

(As usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly and uniquely for this platform — NOT cross posted anywhere else!)
Created at 20220629 01:07 PDT

0599/1845



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

i believe any [d]elusion of privacy within cyberspace, and society at large, is purely that… delusional. with artificially intelligent (a.i.) super-computers, in the hands of the corporatocracy, monitoring and tracking, and most likely recording perpetually, our every movement, action and digital purchase… no one can/could have any expectation of true “privacy”.

i, personally, have accepted the fact that i can not hide, and have never really attempted to hide within cyberspace.

and, even when i did think that i wanted to go underground and/or off-grid, in order to not be tracked by THE beast SYSTEM, even before taking any action toward (e.g. operational security opsec), i stopped and realized i was not afraid of THE beast SYSTEM and that i stand in ultimate integrity and if THE SYSTEM wanted to find and/or harm me… they could bring it and i Will defeat THEM!

NO fear (here); GREAT Faith! i am man -in sovereignty!*

0
0
0.000
avatar

On one hand, a degree of anonymity can be essential. There are antisocial people who are willing to use coercion and violence against those who dare disagree. Governments also often punish people for unapproved opinions even now. On the other hand, I can see the benefit of verifiable identity on a platform like Facebook or Twitter where people claim to be specific individuals.

I think there is a place for more anonymous forums, psudoanonymous blockchains, and verified IDs. The real concern is what companies like Facebook and Twitter do with the information they mine from their users, to whom they sell it, and how intertwined they are with governments.

0
0
0.000