Film Review: A Star Is Born (1954)

26 days ago

(source: tmdb.org)

Hollywood practice of remaking its classics is nothing new, and an example could be found in 1937 drama A Star Is Born, which has been remade three times, resulting each time with very different film. The 1954 version, directed by George Cukor, is often considered the most glamorous and spectacular telling of the same story, with a strong following among fans of classic Hollywood musicals.

The plot begins in Hollywood during spectacular gala benefit concert which is attended by Norman Maine (played by James Mason), once popular film star whose career has started to fade. He often takes solace in drink and, while inebriated, he crashes the stage during music number. Esther Blodgett (played by Judy Garland), singer and one of the performers, skilfully handles the situation and saves Maine from embarrassment by making it all look like part of the act. When he sobers up, Maine decides to boost her career, partly out of gratitude and partly because he is genuinely impressed by her singing talent. He puts her in touch with his producer Oliver Niles (played by Charles Bickford) and Esther gets the break she needed, slowly building stardom under new name “Vicki Lester”. Two of them soon fall in love and marry, but their careers take opposite directions – while Esther scores hit after hit, Norman’s film continue to flop, causing resentment and self-pity that would lead to more drinking and embarrassing incidents which would ultimately face Esther with difficult dilemma.

The film was produced by Sidney Luft, Judy Garland's husband, envisioned as a comeback for her following a four-year hiatus caused by mental problems and substance abuse addiction. The script by Moss Hart generally follows the 1937 version, but with some notable changes. The character of Esther Blodgett/Vicki Lester is changed from an aspiring actress to a more experienced bar singer, a change that was made to showcase Garland's singing talent. The musical numbers, composed by Howard Arlen and with lyrics by Ira Gershwin, are very likeable, including the ballad "The Man Who Got Away" and the "Born in the Trunk" segment, which functions like a film within the film. However, there is a disconnect between the musical numbers, which belong to Hollywood’s escapist fantasy, and the actual plot, which paints Hollywood in a realistic and rather dark light.

Sidney Luft aimed to make the 1954 film grander than the 1937 version, with a large budget at George Cukor's disposal, making it the most expensive film in Hollywood's history by that date. The use of Cinemascope format, which looked impressive as for 1954 audiences as Technicolor had been in 1937, is still impressive today, but modern audiences are already accustomed to it, and the film may not seem as grand. The desire to make the film epic, along with the introduction of long music numbers, resulted in a film that was over three hours long in its original version.

The 1954 film had a very good cast, with many members trying, and for the most part succeeding, to portray their characters differently than those in the 1937 version. Judy Garland played a more insecure, weaker, and almost neurotic heroine, compared to the saintly character played by Janet Gaynor in earlier film. James Mason, however, gave a truly memorable performance as Norman Craine, playing the character in a more realistic and convincing fashion than Fredric March did in the 1937 version.

Unfortunately, all these efforts were partially ruined by Warner Bros., whose executive, concerned over box office, has cut twenty minutes of running time, including some important scenes, after the premiere. In 1983, when a restoration was attempted, it turned out that some of the materials had been lost, and the original version was only partially reconstructed with the use of production stills. The result is a film that, despite the skill and talent involved, looks patchy and unfinished.

Despite being popular among audiences and cherished by Judy Garland fans to this day, "A Star Is Born" did not receive a single Oscar, despite several nominations. Most modern audiences would probably agree with this result, as the 1954 version, while showcasing Garland's talent, is not a grand film and could be best recommended only to fans of classic Hollywood musicals.

RATING: 6/10 (++)