RE: Shitcoins Today: Issue #6
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
A post about how you compile those reports is definitely worthy the tag.
I feel being able to interpret the data and draw a conclusion (or a hypothesis) seems to work better than an accounting of what happened.
Like, are there special relationships between those stats that you have drawn over time?
Some of my posts took covid stats from my state's website, but I try to derive meanings from them instead of "here you go, and yeah".
Although, that does make @stemgeeks' reports seem a bit silly to vote on. But that is supposed to be the tribe's announcement account, so it feels like it deserves an exception. It burns the rewards anyways.
@themarkymark, @inertia, and @balticbadger could also drop their opinions on this.
The STEMGeeks post don't really fit in the Tribe but they are there for disclosure to the community. Some meta is unavoidable. My comment to Abh12345 explains my reasoning a little.
Yep, the process being more valuable than the results.
The results can be valuable too if there are extrapolations on them.