RE: Pay2Win - Blockchain Gamings Downfall?

avatar
(Edited)

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

i totally agree with you. one of the main reasons i don't play splint or other similar games is the paytoplay/earn attitude. It's ok to pay a certain amount if you want some extras but not extras that can deem who is better.

The purpose of the card games was different strategies one can use. I have seen that by paying not only you eliminate the fun of it, but you eliminate the whole "buy packs" think.

We buy the packs for a chance to find some awesome cards and sometimes these packs are bought with a lot of grinding not necessarily money. So back to the question of why a user to join splint for instance?

i wouldn't because i got no chance to do mostly anything except if i pay lots of money that i don't have. and even if i do that i will lose to somebody that paid more. They need to find the balance between "fun" "paying" and "earning".

take lol for example. a game that is solely based on skill and teamwork. Sure they have other problems like the toxic community but it's not a pay to win game for sure

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
1 comments
avatar

Aye, that about sums it up perfectly.
Spending money should increase the fun you have playing a game, not your chances of winning said game :-)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000