Virtual Currency Tax Fairness Act - Bill That Makes Sense

avatar

cryptopayments.jpeg
source

A couple of days ago two US Senators, Pat Toomey and Kyrsten Sinema introduced a bill titled Virtual Currency Tax Fairness Act. The goal of the bill is to simplify use of cryptocurrencies for everyday purchases. If this bill became a law it would remove the obligation of capital gains taxes for purchases made with crypto assets and don't exceed $50. Now this would be real progress in transitioning towards towards better payment systems that would benefit not only ordinary people but also the merchants.

Some people are already criticizing the bill, saying $50 is not enough and this limit should be raised to $200 or $500. I understand the logic of this and agree $50 is kinda low. However, considering the benefits of such bill passing, I would be more than happy with $50 limit. It is great to see that there are some politicians who are actually working on making some useful laws. At the same time is highly unlikely we would see something like this becoming a law anytime soon. It just makes too much sense.

It has been clear for a while now that one of the greatest obstacles for any crypto assets like bitcoin, litecoin, or hive becoming regular payment systems in the real world is capita gains tax. Of course, capital gains tax regarding crypto is not same in all jurisdictions. For now, we are talking about the US. Current law is, when anybody sells crypto assets for profit they must pay capital gains tax, regardless how low the amount it. This means if one would use a crypto asset to pay for purchases, each transaction would trigger a capital gains taxable event.

I don't see huge issue with paying capita gains taxes on profits, be it stocks or crypto. The main problem is keeping track of these transactions, and prices of the assets at the time of the transactions, and keeping records of profits and losses. At least when we trade these assets, there is a history of trades and software and platforms usually provide the data needed to file taxes. This extra work and lack of clarity regarding capital gains taxes for small purchases, make it difficult for people to even try these payments methods. Why bother?

It may be more convenient to just sell the crypto assets to USD and continue paying with USD. Why use same old systems when there is a better one, that offers real benefits and saves money. Merchants who accept crypto payments would be among the first ones who take advantage of these systems, because they would save a lot of money on transaction fees. The finality of the payments, would also provide merchants extra peace of mind that banks wouldn't reverse the payments with "charge back" mechanisms. Also, blockchain can help merchants build better accounting systems and paying their suppliers with the same crypto payments.

What I really like about this bill is that it doesn't only focus on bitcoin. It generalizes all crypto assets and refers to them as virtual currencies. Virtual currency is defined in the bill something that means a digital representation of value which - (1) functions as a unit of account, a store of value, or medium exchange, and (2) is not a representation of the United States dollar or any foreign currency.

First part of the virtual currency definition is clear. But the second part is a bit confusing. My question is, would stable-coins be considered as representation of the USD? Technically, stable-coins are not created by Federal Reserve and don't really represent the currency itself. They only try to keep the value as close to USD as possible. I am leaning to say something like HBD could be considered virtual currency. Let's go with that for now.

If paying with HBD wouldn't trigger capital gains tax as long as the payment amounts are under $50, this can be huge. I can see many apps and solutions emerging utilizing HBD's unique features and Hive blockchain as payment system. I am sure this will benefit all crypto assets, but stable-coins can see more benefits, just because it makes it easier for merchants for pricing their products and services, and accounting.

In my opinion, the approach this bill is taking is better than crypto legal tender laws. One of the reasons is, if any country would introduce crypto legal tender law, it most likely would be bitcoin as legal tender, just like in El Salvador. I don't think all crypto assets would become legal tender. It can get even more confusing if that happened. By letting all crypto assets eligible to be used as payments without capital gains tax, it also creates a fair competition, facilitates innovation, and in the end better technology would be used the most.

I would even argue against bitcoin becoming legal tender. Bitcoin is many things for many people. Some view it as freedom, some view it as better money, some view it as store of value, some see it as a payment system, and some as just another investment instrument. I tend to think for majority, especially the institutions, bitcoin is an investment instrument. If bitcoin were to become a legal tender and all capital gains obligations removed, then this would automatically put bitcoin in advantage over other investment instruments. Institutions would hesitate to invest in bitcoin, and it may even become the most preferred asset to invest in, since there would be no taxes to pay in the end.

Counter argument could be, all investments are risky. Bitcoin being scare by code and having predictable supply, and its global brand recognition already makes it a no brainer investment that will continue gaining value over time. Even without legal tender and with capital gains obligations, bitcoin is in a strong position. It has proven time after time that it always goes back to its previous all time high prices, and makes new highs. This won't stop anytime soon, if ever. That's why bitcoin without being a legal tender can compete with other investment options. It doesn't need any unfair advantages.

That said, I would love to see bitcoin legal tender in some places where it can bring economic boost, and contribute to innovation, and attract businesses. I would love to see bitcoin as legal tender in the US as well. But that is highly unlikely to happen. And that is ok too.

I really like this bill and what is trying to do. I wish these senators good luck in their efforts making something good happen. Even it fails this time. I think they are taking steps in the right directions, and time will come when something like this will become a reality. Let me know your thoughts on this topic in the comments.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
20 comments
avatar

I think that cryptocurrencies will indispensably be virtual currencies in the future. We have had enough of their inflation, recession...

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's definitely a step in the right direction AND $50 is way too low. Lol
Still I'll take it over nothing. It makes small purchases with crypto possible. It's nice that you would have to file a tax return on the pack of gum you purchased.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This post has been manually curated by @bhattg from Indiaunited community. Join us on our Discord Server.

Do you know that you can earn a passive income by delegating to @indiaunited. We share 100 % of the curation rewards with the delegators.

Here are some handy links for delegations: 100HP, 250HP, 500HP, 1000HP.

Read our latest announcement post to get more information.

image.png

Please contribute to the community by upvoting this comment and posts made by @indiaunited.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Who actually wants to deal with crypto outside of well crypto enthusiasts? I don't think this minor change solves much?

0
0
0.000
avatar

It will motivate more innovation in crypto space which will make crypto payments mainstream. People would be used crypto without even realizing it. Just like we use fiat today, without fully understanding what is actually happening behind the scenes.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think the bill is on the better end of what they will propose but I still prefer it if there were no regulations built on top of crypto.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

!PGM
!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sent 0.1 PGM - 0.1 LVL- 1 STARBITS - 0.05 DEC - 15 SBT tokens to @torran, @geekgirl

remaining commands 5

BUY AND STAKE THE PGM TO SEND A LOT OF TOKENS!

The tokens that the command sends are: 0.1 PGM-0.1 LVL-2.5 BUDS-0.01 MOTA-0.05 DEC-15 SBT-1 STARBITS-[0.00000001 BTC (SWAP.BTC) only if you have 2500 PGM in stake or more ]

5000 PGM IN STAKE = 2x rewards!

image.png
Discord image.png

Support the curation account @ pgm-curator with a delegation 10 HP - 50 HP - 100 HP - 500 HP - 1000 HP

Get potential votes from @ pgm-curator by paying in PGM, here is a guide

I'm a bot, if you want a hand ask @ zottone444


0
0
0.000
avatar

PIZZA!

PIZZA Holders sent $PIZZA tips in this post's comments:
@torran(4/10) tipped @geekgirl (x1)

You can now send $PIZZA tips in Discord via tip.cc!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't think a bill like this can pass.

It creates a loophole that allows anyone to not pay taxes on any crypto as long as they launder the money through vendors in $50 increments. The first people who do this will be the vendors themselves, selling product to themselves, but eventually the loophole would be opened up to others and a small fee taken to make the business model viable.

At the end of the day crypto can't really be taxed. By definition crypto is essentially a sovereign digital nation of city-states; each network with it's own rules and regulations. Regulations from the outside are irrelevant and ignored.

With this in mind it will start becoming obvious to people that being a citizen of their own country is actually synonymous with being a financial slave to that government. The entire concept of taxes isn't going to make sense when mainstream adoption rolls around. When crypto provides better infrastructure than the governments themselves, people are going to start renouncing their citizenship and refusing to pay this protection money.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is a great point. I think there would have to be some kind of a limit, like $50 a day or something like this. I agree, without any limitation, this would be a huge loophole resulting in most people not paying any capital gains.

I doubt most people would be renouncing citizenships. This would mean relocating. People generally do not like moving.

0
0
0.000
avatar

whoa! NO taxes. that would be super! :)

Some people will never be content no matter what the # is..

0
0
0.000
avatar

In theory since there is no real law on crypto should one have to pay anything at the moment?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

IRS doesn't need a special crypto law to collect taxes. If there is an income regardless how the income was received/earned, it has to be declared and taxed. In other words, if you sell anything of value you need to keep records of costs associated, market value, or fair value and declare profits.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think this is a well reasoned approach to this topic.
This bill doesnt deliver everything crypto enthusiast could want, but it's is an excellent start.
I also agree that any laws should be crypto agnostic, and not give any crypto an advantage over the others. Let the market decide, and let innovation have a chance.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Putting on my tin foil hat, the government will do everything in their power to tax crypto to hell. The government and the Federal Reserve would stand to lose a great deal of power and control if crypto was widely accepted. If crypto becomes a viable tax shelter, every major corporation and bank would transition to crypto within a year or two.

0
0
0.000