Baby Brownie & Rera Pan 400 ISO, 127 size film

avatar
(Edited)

R1-06228-0007.jpg

I am shocked that this photo came out of that tiny camera below. Sure it has some light leaks and the film apparently wasn't tight enough but I have perhaps mentioned one thousand trillion times that character is the thing that I seek so here it is. A tiny camera with character. I love the light leaks!

This is absolutely my favourite photo.

20221126_163316.jpg

Type: Solid Body Eyelevel Rollfilm
Introduced: July 1934 (1948 In UK)
Discontinued: 1941 (1952 In UK)
Film Size: 127
Picture Size: 1 5/8 X 2 1/2"
Manufactured: US And UK
Lens: Meniscus
Shutter: Rotary
Original Price: $1.00

https://www.brownie-camera.com/1.shtml

20221209_222204.jpg

The exposure lever down there, below the fixed focus lens, is horrible to use. The 1/50 fixed shutter speed is so slow (it may be even slower because the camera is old) that it's really easy to accidentally shake the camera if the shutter release is a button and far more easier if it's a lever like this one. So every time I could, I tried to support the camera or if hand held, my elbows somewhere.

Furthermore, it's really easy to just photograph your finger if you're not paying attention as the camera is so tiny and the lever is where it is.

The knob above the lens is for longer time exposures when pulled out. Then of course you have to hold the shutter lever too so that the shutter stays open. That's how I took the best photo. Camera on the table and counted seconds in my head. Can't remember how many, as many as the light meter app on my phone said it needs with 400 ISO and 1/16 aperture.

20221209_221802.jpg20230207_131127.jpg20230207_131246.jpg

Cleaning, dusting and film in.

20230207_131420.jpg

I'm ashamed to admit, it took me a little while to put the film correctly in. This was one of those days that I not only put it to the wrong side so that I would have just winded it back after putting the film in, I managed to put it the wrong way so that the backing paper would have been the thing I would have been exposing. Jeez it was hard! I mean, the camera has two parts and then there's the film that's the third puzzle piece and I had to try all the combinations before I managed to put the film correctly there.

Dumb, dumber, insane.

20230207_131543.jpg20230207_132041.jpg20230207_132221.jpg

But eventually I got it.

20230207_132346.jpg

Rera Pan ISO 400. The only film that is available for 127 film size cameras. At least in Finland.

20230207_132354.jpg20230207_132454.jpg20230207_132549.jpg

Winding, winding, winding.

20230207_132602.jpg

Cute! A piece missing but nevertheless cute.

20230207_132805.jpg20230207_132814.jpg20230207_132822.jpg

I thought that missing piece deserved some tape. And the number window of course also. And, as I do learn sometimes from previous mistakes, if the camera has a lever or a knob or anything that turns easily which shouldn't turn at all if you have film inside the camera, like the cap or lid or half of the whole camera that when turned, opens and the film is exposed, I taped the opening lever too.

20230207_133756.jpg

I managed to dig out some info of the settings of the camera.
http://www.artdecocameras.com/cameras/kodak/baby-brownie
Of course I could have done things like I did with my first old cameras, just ques something and hope for the best, but I wanted to be more sure and also use the light meter app on my phone because I did not want to waste a single frame of this expensive film to over or under exposure.

How expensive? Continue reading or scroll down if you can't wait.

20230207_133836.jpg20230207_133909.jpg

Ready to go!

As usual I've done nothing to the photos. Few of them might be better if post-processed but as I want to show you what kind of results does this camera and this film give in different conditions, I've left them as they are and I'll show you the photos with all of mine and the cameras flaws in the pictures.

R1-06228-0003.jpg

Camera not hand held but on the table.

20230211_145802.jpg20230211_145813.jpg

Comparison photos taken with my phone. 😄

R1-06228-0000.jpg

If I remember correctly, this was the first photo I took with my Baby Brownie. I tucked my other elbow to my side and the other one to the wall on my right. But still couldn't keep the camera steady. A very tricky shutter lever.

R1-06228-0002.jpg

Again same problem, even though I'm squatting and my elbows are firmly on my knees.

R1-06228-0004.jpg

Now this is better! As you can see I am capable of taking street photos without trams. Hurts my soul but possible.

R1-06228-0005.jpg20230219_140338.jpg

"Yes, yes, yes. I can hold the camera steady in my hands and take an indoor photo that has to be exposed a second or two."

Yeah, sure.

R1-06228-0007.jpg

What did all this cost me?

The Baby Brownie was one of the three cameras I bought from a second hand shop a while ago. The three cameras were 30 euros altogether so I guess it's 10 euros for the Baby Brownie.

The 127 size film is the most expensive film I have ever bought. I waited for a while if the only 127 size film would be in discount some day because that's how I've bought most of my films, but no luck there and I just couldn't wait anymore.

Baby Brownie: 10€
Rera Pan 400: 19,90€
Film developing: 17,90€
Film scanning to TIFF: 20€

That's that! Paying that amount didn't hurt as much as I though and fortunately I no longer have any other money consuming addictions.

I found Zenit and Nikon cameras few weeks or moths ago but have had no luck in finding lenses to the cameras. So I went to my trusted film provider and asked if they had cheap old lenses, in any condition, and what do yo know, they did. Of course I had to buy those because I can't wait to try out the Zenit and Nikon cameras. I also got extension tubes and a PORST reflex. The tubes fit to the Zenit and as the lens that fits to the Zenit was attached to the PROST camera, I got those for free. The PROST has couple of flaws but that didn't prevent me from jumping up and down from joy. (At home where there was nobody but cats watching.)

20230411_121604.jpg

Ooooooo! A new old crappy camera!


Film cameras
Balda-Bünde Baldixette 1
Bilora Bella 66 1
Bilora Bella 66 Standard 1
Closter C63 1
Cosina Flash 35E 1, 2, 3, 4
Dacora Daci 1
Felica 1, 2, 3, 4
Halina Paulette EE II 1
Kodak Box 620 1, 2
Kodak Brownie Six-20 Model C 1
Lubitel 2 1
Voigtländer Bessa 66 1
Yashica 44 LM 1
ZIAG Colora F 1, 2

Films (b&w)
Adox CMS 20 II Pro 1, Adox HR-50 1, Adox CHS 100 II 1, Fomapan 100 1, Fomapan 400 1, 2, Ilford PanF Plus 50 1, Ilford Delta 100 1, Ilford Delta 400 1, Ilford XP2 Super 400 1, Ilford Delta 3200 1, Lomography Fantôme 8 1, Retropan soft 320 1, Rollei Retro 400S 1, Rollei RPX 400 1

Films (color)
Fujifilm 200 1, Kodak Gold 200 color 1, 2, 3

Digital cameras
Sony A6400, 16-50mm 1
Sony A6400, Laowa 25mm f2.8 1
Comparison: Sony A6400, Canon EOS 550D, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P32, Canon PowerShot A550 1, 2



0
0
0.000
28 comments
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 151 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
!BEER
3

0
0
0.000
avatar

Manually curated by ackhoo from the @qurator Team. Keep up the good work!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @insaneworks! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You got more than 5750 replies.
Your next target is to reach 6000 replies.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

LEO Power Up Day - April 15, 2023
The Hive Gamification Proposal
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
0
0
0.000
avatar

This old chap has indeed a lot of character! :)
Wonderful results!

!PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks! The results certainly were quite a surprise.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Beautiful shots! I love the character of the little Brownie, though 127 intimidates me a bit as it's very hard to find here.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks! It sure is worth trying if you happen to find film for it. Then again you can always roll a 35 film to a 127 backing paper that is made out of a 120 size paper. If you happen to have two 127 size spools available. Rolling a film to a wrong size backing paper in the dark and to the spool is sooooooo fun. 😬

0
0
0.000
avatar

It sounds terrifying lol

Although it makes me wonder why they don't sell bulk 120....

0
0
0.000
avatar

Once you do it, you perhaps don't make the same mistakes again. But I have to say that the results with the Yashica 44 where I had the 35 size film, although there was just few good photos, were worth it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Really love the outcome of this baby!
Question, do you really need to scan lossless for so much money? You could go a higher res jpg and still be fine.
And depending on where you live I probably could get your films scanned a lot cheaper, I regularly visit analog cafe in Budapest. You get good results and they even store your film for you or send it back.

I think for this camera you need a very steady hand haha. Love the simplicity though.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

The results surely were a nice surprise.

Question, do you really need to scan lossless for so much money?

I could get it scanned as jpg at the same place but the price wouldn't change. It's always with the film developing 10€ if it's 35mm size and 20€ if it's any other size because the scanning is done by a hand. I do have an old scanner actually, Canoscan D660U, (1200 dpi) and I can scan 35 mm film with it and that would be enough for me to see if the photos are any good. But then if I want to scan photos with better resolution afterwards, it would be 5€/frame and that's far more than I would be ready to pay for.

Sure I could post the film abroad (I live in Finland) but then again the posting would also cost (Finnish postal services isn't cheap) and I wouldn't see the results as fast as I now do, the same day or the following business day. And furthermore, I'm also paying them for the time that I can do something else than scan the film.

I have not searched for other options but I do think that if I could get the scanning done cheaper somewhere, it wouldn't be so much cheaper that it would be worth the trouble. Also I'm happy to support local businesses. Or this local business at least.

I think for this camera you need a very steady hand haha

Indeed. And as several old "How to take photos" guides that are included in old camera manuals say: "Hold the breath". So I did. Sometimes.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Rera, Rera, bo-bera, Banana-fana fo-fera, Fee-fi-mo-mera, Rera!

!LOLZ

I love all the black at whites. Especially the one from inside the cafe through the window. The name on the window looks like a stamp of some sorts super imposed on the image...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks! Rera and baby really did well. The cafe and the window photo was my: "or perhaps this is the best photo of them all" photo.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh EM Geee!!! We totally have the same taste in photos!!! Let's be bff's! We can collage all day!!!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Those turned out absolutely fantastic! I actually have one of those baby Brownies, too, damn near identical to yours, except without the knob. What I don't have is any 127 film for it.

You've got some character in these. I really enjoy that the film wasn't quite tight; it gives the pictures a little extra emotion.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I really enjoy that the film wasn't quite tight; it gives the pictures a little extra emotion.

I think so too. Baby Brownie is absolutely one of my favourite cameras now.

If you ever get 127 film you absolutely have to try your Baby Brownie. Or perhaps do it the hard way and make a 127 film backing paper out of a 120 paper and roll a 35mm film to it. I liked doing that so much that I'm not going to do that ever again, not in this decade anyway.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hahaha! Yah, rolling my own film is nothing I have the patience for. I did find a fellow on eBay selling some re-rolled and cut-down 120 film for $15.00/roll, which is a fair price for the work that needs to go into it. I might go that route.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Not a bad price at all considering the whole procedure is quite a hassle.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for posting. I love the results you got with this almost ancient camera.
sorry for the late attention
gifting! 💚💚💚💚

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks! This camera and the results truly were a pleasant surprise.

0
0
0.000