The Authenticity Of Individual Stances Of Different People; While Perceptions Are Not Universally Admissible

avatar

images.jpeg

Image source

Every of the human stances is often based on sentiment and hardly factual or based on facts In totality. For example everyone can not have equal opinion about a particular thing or another person. So facts cannot be sentimental but a feeling or perception can be totally sentimental and that's why it's important that we as people don't feel that our perception no matter how flawless we deem it is always 100% universal applicable and hence should be believe or accepted by everyone.

A person develops a stance based on the reaction they've initially or formally gotten as a feedback. What does this mean? A person might feel that something is good. Now this thing that's perceived good might be perceived as "bad" by another person this is because their stances are formed differently as a result of how differently that thing they're reacting to have affected them. In other words no one's got a Wrong stance or feeling, the fact that feelings or stances can flawed or doesn't mean the authenticity of the originator isn't real.

Truth is, people can make decisions based on their feelings and there's nothing wrong with this, people are prone to mistakes because they're not impeccable when it comes to strength of resolve. In life, point of views differs and sometimes a person's point of view can be formed by their personality, their history, their families, their gender and even level of exposure and that's why no one can categorically say their perception is factual and can be relatable to another person.

One of the reason why people disagree especially in argumentative situations is because different people have different experience, and these experiences equals real time events and these real time events differs and becomes a set reality thereby forming a way of life through which people live through. Take a practical example; if MR A believes that the government is bad and MR B believes that the government is good, this belief is formed based on two different experience of two people on the same government, now there's no need trying to say MR A is more Right than MR B or vice versa

The reason is because these two people have been affected differently by that same government and their perceptions no matter how flawed it is can not be proven right or wrong over the other. The reason why feelings don't work in the court of law is because it's not a statement of reality, it can be one sided, one dimensional and not admissible or applicable in a universal front.

In conclusion; no one can prove that their perception or stance towards something is completely admissible especially if there's a plausibility that there's a possibility they can be proven wrong even to a slightest point. If a statement isn't universal applicable then it's a perception held by a group of people who's had similar experiences in a nutshell, statements of facts are like theories that's proven over and over again in different recompense. So while you're entitled to the personal authenticity of your stance on a particular issue, someone else does to, especially to their own.




Interested in some more of my works?

The Dangers And Futility Of Being Driven By Vengeance As A Purpose
Preventing The Self From Hitting The Ultimate Boredom Of "Over-Accomplishment"
The Bridge Between "Economic And Politics" In Any Political System Of Governance
The Distinctive Nature Of Man And How It Aligns With His Ever Changing Universe.
Infant Lapsing In The East. (An Original Prose + Poetry)
Why Do People Blame Their Flaws For Unacceptance Or Disapproval?
The Malady Of Being Driven Excessively By Dreams And Ambitions


PicsArt_03-21-07.26.22.jpg


My name is @Josediccus, a young Nigerian student who is a Vlogger, A Psychologist, Poet And Sports Writer/Analyst. I'm using my contents as a process to create shared meaning as well as create expressions through which people on/off hive can relate. I believe content is a process to be enjoyed and relished and I'm up for any collaborations in my field stated above. Cheers


@Josediccus, your brother-in-pen & heart


I'm hoping to reach more people who are broken at heart and spirit, so share on any platform or rehive


My Twitter handle



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

Close to a popular quote that says:

" One man's food is another man's poison"

0
0
0.000
avatar

You just said my mind

0
0
0.000
avatar

"no one can prove that their perception or stance towards something is completely admissible especially if there's a plausibility that there's a possibility they can be proven wrong even to a slightest point"

That is a sentence of gold you put here.

Solid read

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for reading and pointing that out.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I saw it and i was like wow!!! Some dope lines right there @josediccus

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks a lot my friend I'm glad you liked it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hahaha, thanks a lot, it's well written and thought out post, I had to do a lot of work to put that in place. Thanks a whole lot for reading

0
0
0.000
avatar

I really enjoyed this very philosophical and thoughtful reading, I am left with the fact that no one can prove that their, persepcion is manageable

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Simple and short.... This is just a clear story of one man's food is another man's poison. Personally, i dont like cats because i feel they can make me blind. Other people want to spend the rest of their life with a cat... it's just different view of things.. That's why i say there is no need proving a point most times...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah points of view, clearly showcases different perspectives of people, perspectives are stances which is an altruistic personal experience that is held by an individual

0
0
0.000