Hive Tax proposals are failed economics

avatar
(Edited)

CINE40.jpg

It's quite interesting, interesting in the fact that the Americanisation of the financial system is a failed state but I don't need to tell you that, you already know which is why you're here.

You can no longer make it in life as you do as your told, go to uni, get an education, get a job, pay your bills, get married, have a family, buy a house and your life will work out.

Except something is wrong, you've done those things and still do but you're not getting a big enough slice of the economic pie. Even if you've managed to get a second job or a better one you're still struggling. I mean how hard is it to actually live. Not even make a million and retire, just put food on the table and keep a roof over your head. Many are feeling your pain.

Which is why I'm shocked and not suprised at the continued Americanisation of Hives economic system.

There are some new proposals floating around and I would urge people to read them in full and if a vote comes up, vote with knowledge, although it won't matter because you probably don't have a big enough stack and Hive isnt really decentralised, it is centralised as it can be bought. The bigger your stack the more votes you get. Or, the more power your vote has. The few making rules for the many.

I thought we were trying to stop it that's why we're here? Right? Hmm.

Nothing is ever decentralised, it is the greatest myth sold on block chains and it is also the least important as people are just pump and dump, the ultimate free market where good projects fail because the focus isn't on benefiting the broader community but rather a quick buck.

But that's not why we're here today, today I want to provide some commentary on some of the proposed taxes on offer.

Instant Hive

CINE41.jpg

Nothing is more dangerous to a network that relies on long term staking than it's rapid ability to unstake. If you recall my previous comments around CUB finance I expressed concerns around instant unstakes and that there should be a mandatory 14 day unstaking period. Many of the big chains do it and this is less about retaining people's tokens and more about providing market certainty.

See staking your tokens for a period also removes FUD. If prices begin to drop you don't get mass amounts of people getting emotional and dumping unleashing a snowball effect.

It also prevents mass clean outs something CUB is experiencing at the moment. Where big whales entre, dominate the reward pools and clean up everyone's money. When you include the option to lock cash two things happen. The more you have the less likely you are to lock it up for long (hence the current proposal to instant unlock because big stacks don't want cash locked up). The more likely you are to get more people utilise smaller investments. You don't want whales in your project if one comes along you've got problems coming but no one has managed to realise this in 11 years of block chain.

As a project you want lots of small investors that add up to a whale. This protects you against a massive dump and losing your project. But let's be honest, crypto is more about Lambo and less about functioning use cases.

Yet here we are, on Hive, with a functioning use case about to fuck it up.

I understand that the instant power down is at a fee, a fee that only the top would be able to mitigate and would allow them to play the market. Let's do some basic math.

Whale
Powerdown Value - Fee + upvote value = reward pool pillage. Upvote enough over the 7 day period to cover the fee = NO TAX

Everyone else
Can't mitigate VP to low.

You'd be excused if right about now you say "well they worked hard"

Untitled design69.jpg

That's a joke right? They worked hard 🤣🤣🤣 enter bid bots, gaming the system and taking advantage of it. Also there is already a tax, a poor tax. It has been the dumbest thing I have ever heard of. Also the system is geared AGAINST smaller users.

Something called a CURVE or more a crane that scoops up all those juicy Hive and sends them up. As a financial investor in Hive it's one of the key things that prevents me from dumping 10k+ on it. Think I'm lieing, go check my CUB wallet, I dumped a few k in there. Dumped a few k in Leo.

Governance is key.

This oh you haven't earned 20 Hive so we are taxing you to prevent reward pool farming is false. Reward pool farming has been going on for as long as the service has been around. It's just how it is.

So to enable a instant power down at a tax that can be gamed is another win to an unequal platform. It will also provide a quick exit with our cash for those with big stacks. Go play another market, not Hive.

I am supportive of a 4 week wait

Power Up Tax

Untitled design67.jpg

This one is hilarious, like we don't already have one? Oh yes. I forgot, if you earn over 20 Hive you don't get charged a power up tax because "curve". I'm supportive of this only if it is applied to payouts over 30 - 40 Hive.

I would even suggest cranking it upto 35% tax WHAT A 35% tax! Yes. To stop the massive funnel where people keep upvoting big stacked players that produce crap content in the hopes to get their attention for an upvote.

Implementing a tax on the top end will enable a better distribution of upvotes outside of circle jerks. It is the number 1 thing you can do to build a better economic system on Hive. But it's not being proposed because guess what. No one wants to give up their stack or games but they will focus on taking from others. It is human nature.

We create a system to negate the crap one we're in but only to create the same...... we like to blame politicians but it's not the politicians when you remove them from it and here we are, same outcome.

Switch a Power up tax for a top end curve and I'll support

Untitled design68.jpg

Culture is you're biggest impact on the community, if you want to grow the token you need to grow investors not provide them a quick exit that can be gamed and creates a culture of Pump and dump which has been so bad for the rest of the cryptocurrancy world.

Hive is an expensive token, for an infinite supply sitting at its current price is huge. 40c+ Infinite = bigger market cap than bitcoin. Seriously...

Fear still controls the network with all previous gaming systems used to create some megalomaniacs and no safeguards.

What investor is going to want to put their money at risk? This is all public and if you searched it would come up.

We need a focus on block chain culture

Conclusion

I don't want to knock anyone about these proposals. They're great and shows people are really focusing on further developing the block chain to be successful and we need these discussions otherwise we remain stagnant.

The tax proposals I can see are a build upon of new RFI which is fantastic and I can see how it fits with Hive being an infinite supply. But Hive is 4 years and we are too late in the game for an RFI model. There needs to be measures to ensure people don't rort it.

The comment point of "its my money why can't I unlock it" isn't a valid one in my opinion and people need to stop looking at it this way. No, no it isn't you're money.

Your money is being generated from our money and the system is just giving some a greater slice to our money than others.

The focus is not on the individual and shouldn't be. It is on the block chain and the above proposals are shifting the focus away from the block chain and its community and providing further inequality and power to the top.

This is the failed economic system of neo liberalism.

But what do I know? I just do this for a living.

What are your thoughts, do you agree with my points or disagree?

Images source:Canva Pro Subscription and I've created some.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
16 comments
avatar

Good post matey.
I don't agree with everything you said, but this stuff needs to be talked about in the open market of ideas.

....Something the powers that be really don't want...I wonder why?(sarc).

(the highest upvote - of $130 - was downvoted to less than $20 - I was questioning 'code is law' paradigm - coincidence?...yeah, right...this place is becoming a cesspit of tyrannical toxicity. Don't let kids do mans job, and all that....)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you, I'm guessing you'd be against all taxes but no tax is a bad thing. Without it there can not be function's or supports.

Investors look for protections and supports hense why there is regulations in the stock market. Cryptocurrancy has provided the perfect example on why a 100% free market world cannot work.

Many I'd anticipate would feel the same but are too frightened to speak up. Paying crumbs keeps people silent and prevents the guillotine.

However, it also gets people to vote with their feet. Looking at hive accounts biggest cohort are from developing nations where $2 is a lot of money.

Where they are good they really also need to be seperated because this is where a global one currency doesnt work. It's value is disproportionately beneficial depending on where your from.

Also, we want to attract more westerners and western economies to hive. We ars the ones with the disposable income that can be spared.

Communities is a great way of doing this as PoB has proven.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is some good food for thought. There are going to be a lot more problems to figure out over the coming months and bringing up the issues is a way to get the ball rolling. There could be real issues with instant unlocking, there could be massive dumps you never see over 13 weeks. It could work out well for long term holders if the "game theory power down tax" takes effect. I haven't made my mind up one way or the other. It is good to have these posts to discuss it.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nothing is more dangerous to a network that relies on long term staking than it's rapid ability to unstake. If you recall my previous comments around CUB finance I expressed concerns around instant unstakes and that there should be a mandatory 14 day unstaking period. Many of the big chains do it and this is less about retaining people's tokens and more about providing market certainty.

Absolute nonsense.

ADA, XTZ, etc. all don't do this. Make people want to keep/stake their money to themselves.

Preventing people from moving money freely defeats the purpose of this entire crypto movement in the first place.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Tezos Circ Sup - 800m at $3.2
ADA - circ Sup - 45b at $1.4
Hive- Infinite _ $.38

I could go on to do a break down of use case and systems. Can't compare apples and oranges. Also providing two examples and saying "others" while excluding the fact that there are 4000+ of them. Need to look at the broader picture and take in more examples.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Go ahead. Break it down from top to bottom.

Most of the top projects do not have the nonsensical long locking periods like you insinuate.

Nobody gives a damn about the 4000+ shitcoins that amount to nothing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ok.

ADA where it is a proof of stake token it provides everyone with a reward based on their stake.

If comparing to Hive we already stake in the system and then we vote for witnesses which effectively are node operators. Not all distribute rewards equally and rewards for stake require additional work on Hive. They also include a Proof of Brain addition.

So unless you provide proof of brain you will get 0. Even with proof of brain you have no guarantee to get a reward for your investment.

Also ADA does have a staking penalty and no quick exit. Its literally built into the system. Took me 3 seconds to do the research.

Should I for Tezos? Dont worry I just did.

38 Day wait period for first payout. Theres your stake period. It doesnt change the staking delay from moving it from the back to the front.

Both have waitin periods to join the pool. This achieves the same outcome as an unstake period.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

ADA where it is a proof of stake token it provides everyone with a reward based on their stake.

Did you know Hive is DPoS with a shitty 3% staking rewards? Because we decided that majority of the inflation should go to "content".

Proof of Brain is a garbage inflation allocation on layer 1. It's the core of all rewards drama and the argument of "effortless content" being made.

Also ADA does have a staking penalty and no quick exit. Its literally built into the system. Took me 3 seconds to do the research.

I can exit at will. You don't know how staking works on ADA from epoch to epoch. If I undelegate right now, I will still gain staking rewards until the rewards for the epoch I exit finish calculating. In fact, I never even have to undelegate AT ALL to move my funds. The chain will calculate my "staked amount" the next epoch.

Hey, but guess what? I can move all my money I want without much of a hassle.

Cut the horseshit.

0
0
0.000
avatar

for the average and small user like me, i would just leave it to them to make the proposal and vote, as my vote won't be that matter. also my knowledge can cope with all the technical side of the platform.

what i wish is that, any changes taken would benefit all of us, not just a big account but for most of the user across hive.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yup, i'm pretty much in agreement with you. If there has to be an instant power down option, i feel the tax on it should be calculated based on how much curation/author rewards over the staked period.

Speaking of Cub, it seems to be in a death spiral. Hopefully Kingdoms does something to revive it.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hf25 is going to be a major alteration of the power dynamics here.
If people want to pay a tax to long term holders to get out quickly, let them.
The odds of them being able to time the market and not get caught out of hive when the moonshot finally goes up will be well worth it, to me, just to wave at them.

I'd rather see a reorganization of the current split of the inflation.
Up witnesses to 15% of the inflation and add 10 more to consensus, for 30+1.
50% to the reward pool.
20% to hp holders.
3% to the dao. Devs need to create stuff that increases value, not just suck off a never ending piece of the inflation.
12% to 3 day staking in the savings accounts.
Shorten powerdown to 10 weeks, just cause we can.

Now, these are splits of the inflation, not a reflection of how much that inflation will add up to in your wallet.
The savings accounts won't get 12%, but whatever their share of the 12% works out to be.

This makes more sense to me than any of that other nonsense.
Taxes, smdh.
Why pay tax when inflation taxes everybody?
Just print more money.
400million hive isn't very many when the masses get here.

I was here for the tail end of the 160% inflation of early steem, some people could watch their account value go up each time they hit f5.
They cut that off in the first fork I was here for, hf16.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The latest fork will change alot of things and it will be interesting to see how things go. You have raised some good points also.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Its a tough topic and honestly I think 13 weeks might be a bit too long for some investors. I do think a instant with a fee does make sense but I am unsure how much would be the acceptable amount.

I do agree that the rewards and power-up tax doesn't make sense to me though.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000