RE: Neutrality is Assent to the Oppressor

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Your focus and mine are clearly different.

I disagree. Our focus is not exclusive from one another.

Apartheid takes up a third of your post and Desmond Tutu was a part of South African society.

You final subject conclusion is to relate it to bullying.

As you have made the relation yourself I see no distinction between apartheid in any situation - past or modern - and bullying in a social setting.

You could have used any other apartheid situation and any other leader's quote from 'that' situation.

The designation of where it happened is irrelevant.

I am not sure how you see a difference.



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

As you have made the relation yourself I see no distinction between apartheid in any situation - past or modern - and bullying in a social setting.

If you can't see the link between bullying and apartheid, this discussion just became a total waste of time and energy. You maybe should have made that clearer sooner and saved us both a lot of time.

As you read in the post, the quote came to me, I didn't seek it out. I did choose to work with it.

So, once again, you want to talk about social apartheid have at it on your own post. This discussion just ended.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Excuse me - we have another disagreement caused by language.

As you have made the relation yourself I see no distinction between apartheid in any situation - past or modern - and bullying in a social setting.

This means... I see no separation between apartheid in any situation and bullying in a social setting.

0
0
0.000