How Much of Crypto Was Planned? SDRs and Bretton Woods

avatar
(Edited)

download.jfif
1988 Economist Cover

Special Drawing Rights and Bretton Woods

This is going to be one of the rare posts where I actually attempt to discuss finance and explain some of the details. I normally try to stay away from this subject, not because I do not understand it, just because, well, money does not motivate me. Money to me is a tool that allows me to have experience. That being said, this subject is one that fascinates me. The idea that the entire crypto "movement" was designed from the beginning is just, wow! But the more I look into it, the more I am convinced that is EXACTLY what happened. Please allow me to explain.

Bretton Woods

According to Corporate Finance Institute .Com The Bretton Woods Agreement was reached in a 1944 summit held in New Hampshire, the USA on a site by the same name. The agreement was reached by 730 delegates, who were the representatives of the 44 allied nations that attended the summit. The delegates, within the agreement, used the gold standard to create a fixed currency exchange rate. The agreement also facilitated the creation of immensely important structures in the financial world: the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), which is known today as the World Bank.

So, in one swoop we have two of the major influences of the twentieth century, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund created by the "winners" of the second world war. I for one would argue that those "winners" were really the banking interests, Rothschilds and others, but we will not get into that in this post. For this post, we are going to stick to what SDRs are, why they came about, and what role they are playing now in relation to crypto.

Collapse of Bretton Woods

When we look at SDRs, it is important to understand why they were created in the first place. According to Bretton Woods Project .Org SDRs were first introduced in the context of the Bretton Woods’ fixed exchange rate system which came into operation in 1944 and saw many countries fix their exchange rates relative to the US dollar (and, by extension, to gold). The idea was that SDRs, which were initially created with a fixed value of 1 SDR to 1 US dollar, would boost international liquidity at a time when the future of the fixed exchange rate system was uncertain. However, with the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in the early 1970s, SDRs would go on to play only a minimal role as an international reserve asset, making up a small proportion of global reserve assets, which continue to be dominated by the US dollar.

For the next part of the story, we can look to the International Monetary Fund itself. According to their website, "The SDR was initially defined as equivalent to 0.888671 grams of fine gold—which, at the time, was also equivalent to one U.S. dollar." It then goes on to state that, "After the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, the SDR was redefined as a basket of currencies." It is this "Basket of currencies" that is especially relevant to this discussion. I first became aware of SDRs, or "Special Drawing Rights" about five years ago when I saw the news that the IMF had allowed the Chinese Renminbi to be included in the SDR "Basket."

Side Note

I know, I am a nerd, but I follow the United Nations and other globalist groups like the IMF and World Bank because, well, I am the HODL'er of the "Tin Foil Crown," and I am especially interested in the so-called "One World Currency," otherwise known as "The Mark of the Beast."

Moving On...

Now, you may be familiar with the famous statements made by the IMF about crypto such as "IMF warns of global risks from unregulated cryptocurrency boom", and the defining word in that statement is "unregulated." Other statements made by the IMF do get the same sensationalist attention. For example, there has been "talk" largely unreported, about the so-called IMF Coin, which would be THE Central Bank Digital Currency of all CBDCs. If you want to go through the paywall, you can read a Wall Street Journal Article About It Here. For the purpose of this post, it is enough that it exists and is being "talked" about...

SHA-256

There may be people reading this post that are not aware that the SHA-256 algorithm that Bitcoin runs off was developed by the National Security Agency. This is not a "Conspiracy Theory" at all, it is a fact. According to Wikipedia, "SHA-2 (Secure Hash Algorithm 2) is a set of cryptographic hash functions designed by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and first published in 2001." This brings me to the conclusion of this post, where I will attempt to put the dots together for you...

Conclusion

SDRs were developed many years ago but really did not serve a function while the Dollar was the world reserve currency. When the Chinese currency was added five years ago, it signaled the end of the Dollar in that role. Now, governments the world over are developing CBDCs in an effort to subvert decentralized platforms and assets. While all of this is happening, the IMF is developing a "main" CBDC, one CBDC to rule them all, I guess you could say, based on the SDR. Bitcoin was created by the NSA. The NSA specializes and is the foremost computer hacker on the planet. They have tentacles in everything from Google to Twitter. Now, if you consider that algorithms control what trends on the various platforms, it is easy to come to the conclusion that the entire crypto "movement" was planned and designed from the beginning. Every time I see "Doge" trending on Twitter, all I can think about is wondering whether the "DogeArmy" is an organic movement at all or something designed by Artificial Intelligence?

Something To Think About...

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

Since you have some insight, can you tell me how many SDRs are in circulation right now? I looked it up, but couldn't find any statistics.

Personally, I think SDRs are a much better solution than any fiat currency, because they are dynamic in their composition, which provides them with a stability function in times of shifting productivity and capital flows. In my opinion, this dynamic elements makes it superior to the classic homogeneous currency zones (and even more so the Euro or its predecessor the Transfer Rubel). I would even argue that SDRs are much closer to the original pre-1914 setup of the Federal Reserve system, which was designed to sustain the liquidity of differing regional markets.

Bitcoin and other decentralized blockchain systems need to be able to solve the problem of cyclical liquidity shortages. Beyond tokenization (which is equal to fractional banking), I haven't found any convincing approaches which would defy Gresham's Law. In a free monetary market system, currencies that for instance have a best before date would quickly vanish. Others that for instance have payouts to keep their users happy are thinly disguised Ponzy schemes no better than the Turkish Lira.

So far, the best way out of this problem is to centrally impose a bad currency with good intentions, which enables the government to regulate Gresham's Law out of the market.

The only successful real life alternative to central banking that I know of is Raiffeisen's approach to cooperative banking. The big problem here for the digital sphere is that it's based on trust. This works well in and between economies, where people have long-standing social and/or business ties. But the digital sphere is by definition an anonymous place with little cultural liabilities.

As crucial question still remains unanswered, how you can create a decentralized monetary system that has all of these features:

  • It has to be good money in the sense of Gresham.
  • It has to keep all markets liquid at all times.
  • It has to facilitate trust between actors.

Bitcoin can only provide two of the three features. But all three of them are sine non qua. As things are, a well ran centralized monetary system in the digital age is still better than all known alternatives.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @nobutsd1974! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You distributed more than 5000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 6000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

Be ready for the 10th edition of the Hive Power Up Month!
Hive Power Up Day - October 1st 2022
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
0
0
0.000