Is Ideology Blocking Progress in Healthcare..?
Talking about the NHS can drive anyone up the wall, mostly because the conversation always turns political before anyone even asks the obvious: what actually helps people get better care?
Camilla Cavendish recently wrote an opinion piece for the Financial Times, calling out the NHS for dragging its feet with Palantir, a US software company offering tech that could connect all the NHS’s messy data systems. You can agree or disagree with her conclusion, but she gets at least one thing right: public services run headlong into politics all the time, and it gets in the way.

How Data Actually Saves Lives
The NHS is huge. Hospitals, GPs, pharmacies — every single day, they crank out mountains of information. Blood tests, hospital visits, appointments, prescriptions, I mean I could on and on!
But it’s not that the NHS doesn’t have data. It does, but a lot of it is siloed and not linked up.
That’s exactly where Palantir’s platform comes in, at least according to Cavendish. Instead of tossing out all the NHS’s existing tech, Palantir’s Federated Data Platform links it together, so doctors can instantly find what they need.
The upside is pretty clear: fewer repeat tests, faster diagnoses, better hand-offs between hospitals, and a system that spends less time and money chasing its own tail.
The Real Sticking Point: Politics
The fireworks aren’t really about the technology. They're about the company behind it.
Palantir has contracts with the US government, the military, and Israel. That’s enough for plenty of critics to say, “No thanks — the NHS shouldn’t go near them.”
But the other side says: shouldn’t performance matter more than where the software comes from? Should we really ignore lifesaving tools just because of their origins?
It's a tough question. Public money reflects public values, not just the cheapest bid. The government dodges plenty of deals when companies break labor laws or wreck the environment.
Still, what if saying no for political reasons stops the NHS from using tech that genuinely helps patients?
Evidence, Not Ideology...?
Should the NHS just focus on what works..? If some tool improves outcomes and keeps people’s data safe, why reject it on principle?
Or maybe Palintir is just not to be trusted!
Sources:
Financial Times – Don’t let lofty morals hobble the NHS by Camilla Cavendish.