RE: Streamlining Success: INLEO's Consolidation Approach
(Edited)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Sure, LEO in front and Hive in the back could be a win-win. But it also could not be, like the failed DeFi experiments show. Lots of energy wasted with almost no effect (I still remember the hype about liquidity on other chains, bridges, etc).
Also the topic was about "thinning out" the effect by many dapps all going in different directions. Maybe more useful to cut on all the DHF proposals and instead heavily promote the core of Hive itself, to maximize the awareness. This in turn would help all the other dapps and frontends, L2 tokens, etc.
BTW, how many users have been attracted by Inleo so far?
0
0
0.000
Yeah, the defi experiment with cub & polycub sure was a failure but I do like what the team has done with the app itself. The main focus should be on developing the social part, the app, and add defi features later on. It's good to hear that the team is now focused on that simple swap feature and going for those high APRs.
I still believe promoting Hive itself would be a huge mistake. First of all, I don't think the whales even want to, and secondly, I think it's just too late for that. Hive isn't as revolutionary anymore as it was a few years ago. Of course the good basic elements are there and it's a good foundation for dapps such as Inleo.
Hm, there are some valid points indeed.