Inward or Outward: What Should Hive's Perspective Be?

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


There is a great matter of debate.

Some believe that our time should be spent on Web 2.0 trying to get people to come to Web3. Then there is the line of thinking that we should focus upon Web 3.0.

In this video I give my views.


▶️ 3Speak



0
0
0.000
15 comments
avatar

I ask myself that numbers question because I saw the tweets about the narrative topic, I thought oh CTT is going to be packed, at most there was 22 ppl listening so its true, if overall we dont get the ppl who are on Hive active then how ppl from outside is going to be interested

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep. a database of immutable data.
We use this a the database of truth and then scale up from there.

We can't market that we have to market our projects on top of that.
Once we are done we can market. Until then I guess we are the new project "blank"

Your point is so on point no one cares about database.
Your AWS growth analogy is on point.

Thanks for the response.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They don't want to post and be active.

They are upset other coins are going up but our coin is going sideways.

You are right on point with this video

!DHEDGE

0
0
0.000
avatar

1


This post has been selected for upvote from our token accounts by @simplegame! Based on your tags you received upvotes from the following account(s):

- @dhedge.bonus
- @dhedge.leo
- @dhedge.neoxag
- @dhedge.waiv

@simplegame has 7 vote calls left today.

Hold 10 or more DHEDGE to unlock daily dividends. Hold 100 or more DHEDGE to unlock thread votes. Calling in our curation accounts currently has a minimum holding requirement of 100 DHEDGE. The more DHEDGE you hold, the higher upvote you can call in. Buy DHEDGE on Tribaldex or earn some daily by joining one of our many delegation pools at app.dhedge.cc.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why do I have what mostly amounts to "a cat blog?" Because it's universally consumable content that can be shared in many places... as cat content, not necessarily as a Hive promotional effort.

I'm using myself as an example. I ended up here because I read an article that was published on St****t; it had nothing to do with blockchain, crypto, earning money online or the platform, itself. It had to do with a topic I was researching.

That's how grassroots works.

=^..^=

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think the more we just continue to build on Web3 the more people will come. As the old saying goes. Build it and they will come!

0
0
0.000
avatar

We need a mix of both. Hive is barely known to the wider world and crypto has gained a bad reputation, so we need to overcome both of those. We also need to keep current Hivers engaged. I have largely moved off corporate platforms, but I need to stay in touch with some people who only use those. I will keep mentioning Hive to them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

A multi-billion dollar data base. . .

Are there really many Hivians complaining about Hive's lack of attention from the mainstream?

0
0
0.000
avatar

No it appears to be a small minority of folks... who simply complain very loudly and in truly annoying ways.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Instead of complaining, better to focus in growing one's account. I think that would not be easy once Hive becomes viral.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Maybe it is just me but it seems like many of the folks (but not all) who push for more 'presence' on Web2 are the 'me me me' type of crypto-wanker who come off as toxic and divisive... then wonder why no one is interested in following their 'lead'.

I agree that putting all that effort into Web2 platforms.... is 'activity' (clicks, likes, comments, posts etcetera) that would be way more beneficial if it had been done inside the Hive ecosystem.

P.S. From one 'fanboy' to another @taskmaster4450 your commentary towards the end of the video got me thinking about who really has committed the most words to the blockchain. It was kind of funny hearing that in the video because I had just done a rough word count of my posted content (sans comments) and I had somewhere close to 1.65 million words... as of yesterday.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hello taskmaster4450!

It's nice to let you know that your article will take 10th place.
Your post is among 15 Best articles voted 7 days ago by the @hive-lu | King Lucoin Curator by blind-spot

You receive 🎖 1.4 unique LUBEST tokens as a reward. You can support Lu world and your curator, then he and you will receive 10x more of the winning token. There is a buyout offer waiting for him on the stock exchange. All you need to do is reblog Daily Report 129 with your winnings.

2.png


Invest in the Lu token (Lucoin) and get paid. With 50 Lu in your wallet, you also become the curator of the @hive-lu which follows your upvote.
Buy Lu on the Hive-Engine exchange | World of Lu created by szejq

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP or to resume write a word START

0
0
0.000
avatar

Summary:

In this video, Task discusses the debate between focusing internally versus externally in the context of blockchain technology, specifically referring to Hive. He emphasizes the importance of building a powerful database over external marketing efforts. Task highlights the potential of Hive's technology in offering features like freedom, censorship resistance, transparency, mutability, and account ownership. He contrasts Hive's database with centralized options like Amazon Web Services, arguing that successful platforms don't necessarily require heavy marketing efforts but rather focus on providing valuable content that users want.

Task criticizes the lack of user engagement and valuable content on platforms like Hive, suggesting that to attract users, the focus should be on offering what people want, rather than emphasizing narratives that may not resonate with them. He also critiques the current state of Hive, mentioning the need for increased activity and engagement from users to make the platform more impactful. Overall, Task encourages a shift towards building high-quality databases and content that meet users' needs to drive success.

Detailed Article:

Taskmaster4450's video delves into the discussion surrounding internal versus external focus within the blockchain space, with a particular emphasis on Hive's technology. He starts by highlighting the ongoing debate around the necessity of external marketing efforts, contrasting with his belief that the primary focus should be on building a robust database internally.

Task emphasizes that while many advocate for external marketing strategies, the core value of Hive lies in its decentralized blockchain technology, offering properties like freedom, censorship resistance, transparency, mutability, and account ownership. He underscores that rather than chasing external marketing narratives, the platform's strength lies in its database foundation.

Drawing a comparison with centralized solutions like Amazon Web Services, Task argues that the success of platforms doesn't necessarily hinge on extensive marketing but on delivering valuable content that users seek. He points out the lack of engagement and quality content on Hive, questioning why users prefer platforms like Twitter for news over Hive. Task suggests that the focus should be on providing what users want to attract and retain users effectively.

Task criticizes the current state of Hive, highlighting the low engagement and the lack of valuable content that fails to capture users' interest. He stresses the importance of creating compelling databases and content to draw in users, pointing towards successful platforms that prioritize user needs over aggressive marketing tactics.

In conclusion, Task encourages a shift towards building high-quality databases and content that align with users' preferences and demands to enhance user engagement and platform relevance. He calls for a more proactive approach towards content creation and user engagement on Hive to make the platform more appealing and user-friendly.


Notice: This is an AI-generated summary based on a transcript of the video. The summarization of the videos in this channel was requested/approved by the channel owner.

0
0
0.000