The Centralization Of Ethereum

Honestly, Ethereum has had a long historynof issues. This doesn't seem to solve any of them, and bodes negatively for true decentralization.

I agree with the thesis that Bitcoin is a superior product.

Congratulations @taskmaster4450! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You received more than 1480000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 1490000 upvotes.

_{You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP}

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

	HiveFest⁷ Meetings Contest
	HiveFest⁷ - Participate in the Balls of Steel tournament and get a new badge
	New badge - LEO Power Up Day - September 15, 2022

I have heard some of that about Ethereum and its migration to PoS. But honestly, what advantages will it bring us in the future?

In retrospect that was inevitable. PoS always suffer from inner contradictions. And for a coin PoS, it's too lucrative for the centralized players. Coinase will definitely enjoy it.

I thought it would take longer for issues to appear but I do agree that the current centralization is not looking that great for ETH. Killing the mining rewards was just going to cause less block producers to be motivated and they won't be running things at a loss.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta

Seeing ol Klaus take 100% of his salary in eth we can clearly see why this was transitioned to PoS. For control and eventual utility of eth to roll out the CBDC platforms they are foaming at the mouth thinking of controlling us with. I’m hopeful that we can get around it all, given how when the internet rallies behind something such as game stop stock, it has unintended consequences for the assholes trying to control us. I’m trying not to be so gloomy when it comes to this and crypto but seeing people cheer for PoS for eth for months, I had a really hard time getting them to see how terrible of an idea it was for decentralization and freedom.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta

When you see something that is centralized claim it will become decentralized, that doesn't often happen.

Facts

But it is also the only way for it to happen.
Nothing has ever started out decentralized.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta

https://twitter.com/wheelly_dope/status/1571884272134533122
_{The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people( @mcoinz79 ) sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.}

!PGM
!PIZZA

Thank you this was very interesting and insightfull. I appreciated the part where you explain how the witnesses rotate, this is valuable base-layer information that any user can gain value from learning.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta

Summary:
In this video, the speaker discusses Ethereum's recent transition from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake and highlights the issue of centralization that has arisen as a result of this switch. The speaker compares Ethereum's Proof of Stake system to Hive's block production rotation system, emphasizing the potential risks of centralization in Ethereum due to concentration of tokens and control over block production. The speaker also addresses the importance of inflation in incentivizing behavior in blockchain systems, particularly in the context of block production rewards. Lastly, the speaker touches upon the future of Ethereum, potential challenges with decentralization, and alternative options in the blockchain space such as EOS, Gnardo, and Hive.

Detailed Article:
The video starts with the speaker praising the Ethereum developers for successfully transitioning the network from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake. However, the speaker quickly delves into the issue of centralization that has surfaced post-transition, particularly pointing out the dominance of Flashbots in block production since the switch. Flashbots, a centralized entity, has sparked concerns about the decentralization of Ethereum's Proof of Stake model. The article from Being Crypto, as referenced by the speaker, sheds light on the centralization problem that Ethereum is facing.

The comparison between Ethereum and Hive's block production mechanisms is notable. The speaker details how Hive's DPoS system allows for a more decentralized approach, with no single entity controlling more than 5% of block production. In contrast, the speaker expresses concerns about Ethereum's Proof of Stake system leading to increased centralization, especially as efforts are made to turn it into deflationary money. The concentration of tokens in a few wallets and the potential for larger block producers to gain more control are highlighted as significant risks for Ethereum's decentralization efforts.

Furthermore, the speaker emphasizes the role of inflation in incentivizing behavior within blockchain systems. Drawing from the example of Bitcoin's successful growth due to inflation, the speaker argues that a delicate balance must be maintained in rewarding block producers to keep the network running efficiently. This serves as a cautionary tale for projects like Ethereum, where shifting towards a deflationary model could impact the network's dynamics and potentially lead to centralization.

Finally, the video touches on the future of Ethereum, proposing that it may become more centralized over time despite claims of decentralization. The speaker acknowledges the diverse landscape of blockchain alternatives like EOS, Gnardo, and Hive, suggesting that developers have multiple options outside of Ethereum. The overarching theme revolves around the challenges and trade-offs associated with decentralization, token distribution, and block production control within blockchain networks. The speaker concludes optimistically, inviting viewers to stay tuned for the next update.

Notice: This is an AI-generated summary based on a transcript of the video. The summarization of the videos in this channel was requested/approved by the channel owner.