EU Delivering CBDC Regulation: So Much For Fearmongering

There is a lot of fearmongering about central bank digital currencies (CBDC). Part of this includes the timing of it. There are some who claim that FedNow, in spite of being an account based system through the commercial banks, will be the release of FedCoin.

It is pure nonsense.

We now have the EU taking up the measure. It is an area that is advancing in digital asset regulation while the United States drags its feet, allowing Gary Gensler to run roughshod over the industry.

Now we are starting to get some indication of the direction that legislation is likely to move in.

A "leaked" bill shows what is being proposed.

Source

Stop Putting The Cart Before The Horse

When I hear how soon some people are proposing for CBDC rollout, my first question is what network? Where is the infrastructure to house all that is going to be required? For some reason people believe this magically runs on air.

The reality is the EU hasn't even decided to accept a CBDC.

Here is what was said about it:

“The Council will not decide or formulate a joint opinion on whether a digital euro should be introduced, at least not in any near future,” a senior EU official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said ahead of talks that are set to continue Thursday. “I would not expect the ECB to go forward against a very skeptical bunch of ministers.”

That said, it can change with time. As always, it will take a while for them to even decide on what to do. It is ironic that the only thing politicians can quickly agree upon is war. Anything else takes forever.

This, naturally, is to the industry's advantage.

We have another piece of the puzzle that has to be consider:

“The digital euro shall be available for both online and offline digital euro payment transactions as of the first issuance of the digital euro,” said the text viewed by CoinDesk. The level of privacy for offline, face-to-face use should be “comparable” to withdrawing banknotes at an ATM, it said.

Source

Here we have something that is going to take a while. Even if they decided to jump on an established blockchain, how are they going to incorporate the offline transactions. This will likely have to be integrated into some SMS service. We know this can be done with the right set up.

What this means is that, if adopted, this would have to be built. As stated in the past, who is going to do it? Which private contractors are going to do it? What is the bidding process to get the job?

All of this will have to be worked out if they even go ahead of with it.

One noteworthy item is the bill makes it illegal to pay interest on the CBDC. This is to prevent the new currency from competing with the commercial banks. It is one concern many had. The other is privacy which was addressed in the bill. However, this might be questioned since we know that governments like to have back doors built into technology.

Finally, there is a proposed limit to the number of digital euros to be held, with a maximum of 3,000. The idea is to ensure the currency is used for payments.

Competition Means CBDCs Epic Failure

We know the truth rarely makes a good headline and cannot serve as clickbait on YouTube. However, as stated, the idea of widespread CBDCs is no even close. People overlook the most basic aspects to this.

That does not mean this will not come to reality. I firmly believe that as governments start suffer, they will turn to CBDCs as a last ditch effort to hang on. The EU is not in good shape and will likely face default on its [debthttps://leofinance.io/posts/@leoglossary/leoglossary-debt)]( later this decade. That will set off a debt crisis which is orders of magnitude worse than aa bank crisis. When that happens, they will grasp at whatever they can.

Nevertheless, by then the euro will be cooked. I would not be surprised if it is pretty much done as a currency by 2030. The key is people are going to have other options, with cryptocurrency alternatives being central in that. Digital assets are not going away and people will find options that presently are not available to them.

As Web 3.0 evolves, more people will enter the digital realm in this manner. This means we are now dealing with the buildout by private entities. We know there are projects all over the world focused on all aspects of the financial system. Disruption is coming.

CBDCs will be an epic failure. There is no way for them to succeed when facing so many option. Even the US dollar was hijacked by the offshore dollar system. Today, the USD is really a unit of account, a denomination on balance sheets all over the world. Of the tens of trillions (dollars) in daily transactions, there is very little currency involved in the process.

By the time these roll out (the Bank of England stated they might aim for 2030), it will be too late. That is like trying to enter the world of search in 2007 after Google was operating for near a decade. Technology does not slow down.

As is par for the course, we just need to keep building. This is a race and governments own mechanisms slow things down on their end. Right now, the incentive for most countries to act in an expedient manner is not there. We could enter that time. However, if we keep forging ahead, they will not keep pace.

We are dealing with open source software. A half decade in a world like this is the equivalent to 30 years a few decades back. That is how quickly things are evolving.

Governments will always be playing catch up. It is no different with cryptocurrency.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha



0
0
0.000
18 comments
avatar

Good post. I'm interested in what the BaFin will say since I'm in Germany.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is interesting the articles stated that the EU people believe the decision should be political and not just done by the central bank.

As I said all along, CBDCs do not benefit bankers; it is for politicians and bureaucrats. They are the ones chomping at the bit.

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha

0
0
0.000
avatar

Consistently made over $20,000 in income from home with the benefit of smooth playback and sticky online interest. |F330″ I actually made $18,000 with this perfect home income. Everyone can now without a doubt...

Here—>>> https://yip.su/2fqYx5

0
0
0.000
avatar

!PGM
!PIZZA
!CTP

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sent 0.1 PGM - 0.1 LVL- 1 STARBITS - 0.05 DEC - 1 SBT - 0.1 THG - 0.000001 SQM - 0.1 BUDS - 0.01 WOO tokens

remaining commands 6

BUY AND STAKE THE PGM TO SEND A LOT OF TOKENS!

The tokens that the command sends are: 0.1 PGM-0.1 LVL-0.1 THGAMING-0.05 DEC-15 SBT-1 STARBITS-[0.00000001 BTC (SWAP.BTC) only if you have 2500 PGM in stake or more ]

5000 PGM IN STAKE = 2x rewards!

image.png
Discord image.png

Support the curation account @ pgm-curator with a delegation 10 HP - 50 HP - 100 HP - 500 HP - 1000 HP

Get potential votes from @ pgm-curator by paying in PGM, here is a guide

I'm a bot, if you want a hand ask @ zottone444


0
0
0.000
avatar

Nigeria just arrested its central bank governor who had introduced its e-Naira CBDC and slashed cash availability causing massive public protest.

I hope they string him up as a warning to all other central bank governors who defy the clear opposition of the people to CBDCs.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They arent messing around.

Yeah that was a failure. Some believe it was floated to see if the people would embrace it. Well they rejected it in a meaningful way.

Any set back means it buys us more time, which means development. This is a technology race and falling behind is fatal. Governments are just too slow.

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha

0
0
0.000
avatar

By the looks the circumstances surrounding CBDC as it slows down its development should be putting cryptocurrency much more ahead for a robust decentralized currency.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Private money has always being the norm.

In a technological era, we are seeing the race leaning towards open source. When developers all over the world can jump on a project (or start one) that equates to a much bigger race than most envision.

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha

0
0
0.000
avatar

I first read about CBDCs in the news in 2019, so they've had at least four years to work on the infrastructure. If it is truly centralized, then what infrastructure do they really need besides a mobile app, and a data center?

As for the language the CBs are using such as “I would not expect the ECB to go forward against a very skeptical bunch of ministers”, it sounds a lot like "we have no plans to implement a vaccine mandate" a few months before they actually instated it.

I agree CBDCs will eventually fail against cryptocurrencies, but governments could force their adoption in an emergency situation, and people who are 100% in the traditional banking system wouldn't be able to reject it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

What infrastructure was built? What wallets were built? In most countries, unless they are building it themselves, that is contracted out. When did that take place?

If it is truly centralized, then what infrastructure do they really need besides a mobile app, and a data center?

You need to connect to all the other networks and payment systems out there. And how do you do this in a secure manner? Who is responsible for hacks?

Do you see how long it is taking the US to even come up with regulation around stablecoins? We most likely wont see much there with teeth before 2025.

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha

0
0
0.000
avatar

Good questions. That's the difference between crypto, which is developed publicly, and CBDCs which are developed in secret.

It's possible that they have already prepared a lot of background infrastructure that hasn't been announced publicly yet.

I agree that it would be an absolute shitshow if they released in prematurely though.

0
0
0.000
avatar

About CBDCs, is curious how a certain number of states in USA are passing laws to ban the use of CBDCs in their territories.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I believe CBDC will become a reality, and this is just a question of time! Even today in the crypto sphere, stablecoins are becoming one of the prominent crypto people used to keep their wealth.

0
0
0.000
avatar

While I agree that CBDCs have probably lost some momentum due to crypto adoption worldwide these past couple of years, I'm still concerned they won't end up being failures. Keep in mind they are a system of control for current structures to maintain their power, and I don't think they will give up easily.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is extremely encouraging news. There is so much fearmongering going on right now in the United States regarding FedNow and how it will be the gateway to CBDC being forced on us non-bank entities (as if the infra already exists). I appreciate the levelheaded approach you bring to this discussion. Less fear, more logic needed on the Twittersphere

0
0
0.000