Media Industry Getting Hit: Opportunity For Web 3.0

This is a situation that keeps getting worse for the traditional media companies. It is so bad that they cannot deny what is happening. We are seeing a repeat of 2008 in terms of advertising, yet we are potentially dealing with a paradigm shift.

To me, this spells opportunity for those who are entering the market.

So let us dive into what is occurring with the companies and what this could mean for Web 3.0.


Source

Billionaires Getting Tax Write Offs

Over the last decade, billionaires went on a spending spree when it came to media publications. The Washington Post, LA Times, and Forbes were all picked up by the money players. Whether they thought they could revitalize the industry or they simply wanted to control the narrative matters little.

In reality, we are seeing these properties worth a fraction of what they were purchased for.

This is leading to a large number of layoffs. The LA Times just got rid of 20% of its news department. Sports Illustrated fired everyone. The Washington Post, Daily News, Business Insider, and BaltimoreSun all let people go.

At the core of this is advertising. The drop in revenues associated with lower numbers is taking its toll.

The media sector is facing a crisis unlike anything seen since the 2008 financial mess, with layoffs and cost-cutting at every turn. The cuts have all occurred in the backdrop of declining web readership at many major publishers over the past year, as tech giants like meta (Instagram, Facebook) and Google TRY to keep consumers on their own platforms while old standby referrers like Twitter/X no longer deliver as many readers and the social media landscape fractures.

Source

Watching the shift to digital is nothing new. The difference is that we are seeing it accelerating.

This means the billionaires that own these properties are losing a fortune. It is alright since they own a bigger fortune and, for most, it ends up as a tax write off. Jeff Bezos, for example, can take the negative impact from the Washington Post and use that to reduce his tax bill when it comes to selling Amazon stock to fund his rocket program.

Nevertheless, it does denote a shift in the landscape.

It is also not relegated to only print media. Broadcast companies are finding themselves in a similar situation. Layoffs are affecting that industry also.

Web 3.0 Opportunity

Where this is unrest, there is opportunity.

Media has always been the "attention economy". It was a game of eyeballs. This is what is often discussed by within Web 3.0.

Actually, there is little difference between the potential of Web 3.0 and what happened with the digitalization due to the Internet. From the legacy media standpoint, it is just another digital competitor.

The key is ownership. With Web 2.0, we have siloed platforms. This is a bit different under the Web3 model.

Community based initiatives might result in a completely different economic model. This is something that is being formulated so we will have to see how it turns out. However, the idea of a prosumer is nothing new. This emerged with the introduction of social media and expanded.

The "next generation Internet" simply adds equity to the equation instead of just income. Whereas X is now offering content creators a portion of the ad revenue, there is no equity stake for the users. It is still in the hands of Elon Musk and the investors.

Here is Web 3.0 might change things. Those who have stake are financially incentivized to not only produce the content, but also consume it. We are still dealing with prosumption, while adding another layer.

Once people figure this out, it could trigger a massive shift.

Changing Landscape

Companies like Rumble are making headway in breaking up the "monopoly" enjoyed by some of traditional social media platforms.

This is major since it entails breaking the routines of people. Once they are accustomed to switching, that becomes the norm.

It results in a landscape that will shift easier over time. Here is where Web 3.0 can take advantage.

By focusing upon the construction of our own network-state, the services offered by outsiders can come from within. Due to the circular nature of it all, we could usher in a new economic model, at least on a scale never seen before.

Think of it this way:

  • products and services
  • income
  • equity

All are being offered by the same platform to the users.

Under this scenario, why would anyone turn to the traditional media for news, social media for engagement, or Web 2.0 for information? The goal would be to have all of that available within the Web 3.0 platforms.

Here is where the network-state concept comes in. An ecosystem is the blockchain (network) plus all platforms built on top. The stakeholders, both internal and external, also are part of the system since they can benefit and, are incentivized, to enhance what is taking place.

While most believe the future is multi-chain, actually, I foresee tribalism becoming the norm. People are going to start building where their "home" is. As the infrastructure is put in place, the ecosystem will expand from within. There will obviously be outside interest, i.e. other joining. The foundation, however, will come from the "pioneers" or "trailblazers".

For now, we see legacy media on the ropes. They are suffering from a dying model. It is time for Web 3.0 to start looking at the market and taking advantage of the opportunities.

The door is being opened. Now it is up to us to walk through.


What Is Hive

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
25 comments
avatar

Since I've been more active here both creating content and consuming it I've spent less and less time on Web2 platforms. I am not upgraded on X or LinkedIn however I have 2 accounts here on #inleo that are premium.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's why this is a natural migration, as well as producing, you're consuming and both ways bring you financial incentives that nowhere else in Web 2.0 could provide.

The same thing is happening to me now, I hardly go on Instagram anymore and maybe X is the place where I still look for news.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I spend all my time on Web 3 for the most part. Consuming some YT videos is about the extent of my Web 2..and we are working on bringing them over to Hive.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh yes, YouTube is also a cool place to spend time. It will be even better when you migrate to Hive and without a doubt it will be the “icing on the cake”.

0
0
0.000
avatar

As you see I am bringing as much YT content over to Leo and embedding it here.

0
0
0.000
avatar

😂 I just love it how you already open our eyes to the opportunities abounding from the feedback of challenges rocking other platforms not system. You are strengthening our confidence in Hive, thank you.

0
0
0.000
avatar

We have the potential to truly open up some new territory in terms of what the economy looks like. This is where the mindset becomes crucial.

0
0
0.000
avatar

One thing is seeing opportunity, another is taking full advantage of it. Product/service bundled with income and equity puts every web3 user on a win-win scenario. We just need to move early before the gap gets closed.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I believe that for Web 3.0 there will always be room for everyone and that is what makes things here different from Web 2.0 where there is absurd competition for who gets the most audience.

I can't wait for at least 5% of the people who use X to come, for example, those of us who are already here will be more rewarded for being here from the beginning.

0
0
0.000
avatar

for them to come we have to show some working. You know a lot of people have become so use to web2.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I believe we are on the right path and at the appropriate time, things will begin to reveal themselves. Indeed, people are already fascinated with Web 2.0.

But if the opportunity allows them to somehow have contact with Web 3.0, it will be something that will move them and so I don't think it will be difficult to identify where these same people will spend their time. your time.

0
0
0.000
avatar

We are redesigning the economy. Web 2.0 people, for the most part, will not see it.

Equity is key. Web 2.0 cannot offer that.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Such a visionary. I can imagine acting groups getting together and creating entertainment on web 3 along with other types of media and entertainment. We already have storytellers and musicians on hive. !LUV

0
0
0.000
avatar

The possibilities for assembly are endless. Certainly, anyone is free to design their own concepts around this. Actors and other industry people will surely take advantage; at least some will.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The future really is Web 3.0, so if people who are on X every day realize that there is the possibility of also being financially incentivized to consume content, we will see a huge migration to Web 3.0. Time is the lord of reason.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is a lot more than social media.

For example, we are redesigning Wiki.

0
0
0.000
avatar

And it is commendable to be able to be part of this story, something like being able to tell our grandchildren and great-grandchildren in the future how it was possible for us to achieve this transformation. .

0
0
0.000
avatar

So much the web3 is going to change in our world and even in our digital space and it is just a matter of time before we actually see it been achieved. Just a matter of time

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think this was the expected outcome for print media, and news. Back when I was reading the newspaper I would just go to specific topics that I like, like Sports. When they changed to digital, I only ever went to news sites for the big news to try to get different angles of the story. Some of them requiring fees doesn't help. Eventually, news stories and updates started to appear to different websites. If you want sports news, there are sites like NBA.com, or Yahoo Sports. If you want a specific team's updates, they have their own website that have insider info as well.

This is what Hive can do, but difficult to emulate. Those writers and people with insider information can cost a lot. An insider risks getting fired by sharing it outside their organization, or are better compensated by going to big name corporations.

0
0
0.000