The Death of Wall Street

Over the past 3 or 4 years, I wrote a number of articles laying out the death of Hollywood. When I started writing those, many pushed backed, believing much of the basis of my conclusions were nonsense.

Here we stand at the end of 2025, and it is part of the national conversation.

Today, we are going to proclaim the death of Wall Streetn.

This is something that might seem unlikely to many. After all, New York City is the financial capital of the world. We cannot dispute the power of Wall Street institutions and the might they throw around.

Here is the problem for NYC: most of these companies are not Wall Street. They have multi-national operations that exist throughout the world. Offices are located in other cities, fulfilling strategic purposes.

Many, including myself, have talked about Wall Street 2. In this article, I will also go into Y'All Street.


Wikipedia

The Death of Wall Street

Wall Street will die. It is on the path to destruction. What was present in our lives over the past 150 years is now in rapid decline. It is only going to accelerate.

It is not crypto that is causing this although, as we will discuss, that will certainly change things.

At the core of this is simple business. When costs get too high in an area, things move. In an era where digital communication prevails, physical location is less important.

It does matter, however, when it comes to regulation, taxation, and other aspects of government. When this gets onerous, relocation occurs.

A lot is being made of the present Mayor's race in NYC. We will see how it turns out but, with what many are calling a communist as the leading candidate, it does not bode well for the city. Even without his election, the trend is in place.

From Wall Street to Y'All Street

We covered the idea of Wall Street 2. This was a name given to Miami (Southeast Florida) as it attracted a number of financial firms. Many of the largest entities opened up branches in the southeastern part of the state. It was a move that combined the relocation of many hedge funds.

Now we are getting Y'All Street.

Where is that? This is being assigned to the Dallas-Fort Worth area. This is rapidly becoming a hotbed for financial activity.

Texas is cleaning up because it offers financial firms many advantages. At the top of the list if taxation. There is no personal income tax on workers along with a much lower corporate rate. New York hits employees up at 10.9% and corporations between 6.5% and 7.25%.

As stated, this is something that was already in motion. Texas has more financial workers than New York at this point (519,000 to 507,000). Expect that gap to increase.

Starting in 2026, the Texas Stock Exchange will go live.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 30, 2025, authorized the Texas Stock Exchange (TXSE) to operate as a national securities exchange. BlackRock, Citadel, Charles Schwab, and other major institutions are behind the exchange startup that will launch early next year. The TXSE plans to focus on mid-and large-cap issuers through high listing standards and a single-tier exchange model. Those behind the exchange believe that it will help increase the number of IPOs by reducing the regulatory and financial burdens.

Regulation is a major component to this discussion. When states impose too many restrictions, driving costs up, companies adjust.

We are also seeing the largest banks making moves.

Goldman Sachs plans to open a $500 million, 800,000 square-foot location in 2028 and will need to hire or relocate 5,000 employees. Goldman has always operated in Texas, but this new facility will more than double the number of employees in the area. New York remains Goldman’s largest headquarters, but that may change in the coming years as the price of business is more than anyone is willing to pay.

JPMorgan Chase has recently erected a massive 60-story, $3 billion building on 270 Park Avenue, which hosts approximately 10,000 employees. JPMorgan has over 300,000 employees worldwide, 24,000 of whom reside in NYC. However, they have 18,000 people on the ground in the Dallas-Fort Worth area and plan to expand. “It shouldn’t have been that way, but Texas loves you being there,” CEO Jamie Dimon told Bloomberg in 2023.

JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, two of the biggest names in banking are establishing significant presences in Texas. How long until those operations outsize NYC?

The Crypto Impact

We see crypto being hijacked by Wall Street. This means that the same trend will follow.

Firms that engage in crypto will determine where the bulk of the operations reside simply through their geographic operations. If in Texas, much of the activity will take place there.

Crypto mining is already done, to a large degree, in the state. A significant portion of the US mining operations is in Texas.

With a new exchange brings more servers. This means infrastructure expands, something that could be also utilized for crypto. No company has announced anything in this regard but, my guess, is that as operations in the stated are set up, other use cases are applied.

Crypto offers the advantage it never operated in the physical world. There is no legacy system that was strung together as we moved from the trading of physical paper. Humans never physically traded crypto.

That means that any infrastructure that is built automatically can handle crypto. It is only a matter of adding another asset(s) to the listing.

Just like California is losing Hollywood, New York is seeing the impact of Wall Street diminish. Not only are there billions of dollars in tax revenue at stake, culture is also affected. These areas held great power due to their ability to influence society. Hollywood and Wall Street both capture peoples' imagination.

Wall Street is a few years behind Hollywood. For that reason, expect this conversation to ramp up as we head towards the end of the decade. Hollywood recently fell off a cliff in terms of its jobs. Wall Street will follow the same path.

It is likely that, in 2028, the headlines discuss the massive reduction in Wall Street related numbers.

Posted Using INLEO



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

Yeah, the Brickell District in Miami is more 'Wall Street' than Wall Street is now. The thing is now, anyone can really trade from anywhere so as you are pointing out the geographical location really doesn't matter, but it's still the same players playing the game, they have just spread out across the board.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Miami could really be the new Wall Street and the new Silicone Valley

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't think Mamdani is Communist, and even if he were, I don't think that his election would change much of NYC, apart from making city administration slightly more dysfunctional than previous ones. It is, however, more likely to serve as a convenient excuse for the exodus of financial sector and other business for the reasons mentioned in the article.

0
0
0.000
avatar

"Convenient excuse"?!? There is absolutely ZERO chance these companies would be moving their operations if New York was business-friendly. Ego alone is reason enough for them to stay. New York is the financial center of the world and has been for decades. But when you can't walk down a street without literally stepping needles or human excrement, you can't go out at night without at least being nervous, the Police are vilified and seen as the "bad" guys, and then to top it all off, you're taxed at ridiculous levels while all those people causing the problems are getting government handouts, what are you going to do? Other than the NY address, there is literally no reason to stay. Everything is working against you.

Twenty years ago, Giuliani had the city clean and thriving. It's only taken that long for the left to tear it down. They've been using "convenient excuses" for their failures the entire time.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Leaving New York City for strictly business purpose makes more sense for companies rather than individuals. The latter might take family or sentimental considerations, or matters of cultural prestige. And, if certain people have sufficient amounts of money, they simply don't care about trivial matters like average rent, income tax, minimum wage or basic safety on subways and street, and they can afford to be oblivious to which individual or political party controls the local government and affects life of ordinary mortals.

That, among other things explains why certain billionaire CEOs was scaring voters with cataclysm if Mamdani wins, only to immediately congratulate him and offer full support after election was called.

0
0
0.000
avatar

We'll see how much these people care when Mamdani's free promises don't happen because of the tax revenue shortfall from these businesses and their wealthy employees leaving town. Downward spiral.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Fascinating take in this article. As a NYer born and bred, this offered a very interesting perspective. I'm also a two-time graduate from The University of Texas, so I'm quite familiar with what the state has to offer.

Starting in 2026, the Texas Stock Exchange will go live.

This was kinda mind blowing though. I guess it is a race to the bottom to see who will offer the lowest tax rates to businesses and their employees. Texas is definitely winning, since it offers so few social services to its people.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am praying God smites Mamdani, although NYC might be ripe for judgement. I really hope NYC survives so we won't get any more marxists in NC. Bad enough that we have the Asheville hippies and the UNC-indoctrinated faux intelligentsia. !BBH

0
0
0.000
avatar

New Venezuela if they keep electing communists

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is the real reason behind Joe Biden's open borders. New York and California are losing their influence as their populations run to other states. Mostly Red states, I might add. They will be losing House seats unless they can keep their numbers up...thus the massive influx of immigrants. All these "Sanctuary" cities are trying to replace the businesses and local people they are driving out with immigrants they are trying to get counted in the census. That is why they are so gung-ho on giving them "rights". They want their votes, yes. But more importantly, they need them to count as population so they can gain seats. What could be better? A largely poor population, dependent on the "government" for healthcare, welfare, transportation, housing, etc. that they can use to keep themselves in power.

It would almost be comical if it wasn't so sad with the way they are being used and manipulated. Their biggest mistake though, and what will ultimately be their downfall, is that the majority of the people they have brought in are devout Christians and the Democratic Party can barely contain their contempt for Christians. As they keep going further and further left, their true colors will ultimately show through and, media bias or not, the masks will no longer be able to cover the ugliness beneath.

0
0
0.000