Leaked Memo: Democrats Organized Against Crypto

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


There was a leaked memo that was reported on by Fox News. We have to be careful with these "leaks" as they can be made up stuff. However, it is in keeping with some of what we have seen take place over the last year or two.

In this video I discuss how, in the United States, crypto is entirely political now. It will be a hot topic during election season. I also cover what this could mean for crypto going forward.

Here is the article:

https://beincrypto.com/leaked-memo-democrats-organized-anti-crypto/


▶️ 3Speak



0
0
0.000
13 comments
avatar

Because it's a hot topic and a swaying vote for politics it goes to show you how strong and wanting of crypto people are. I'm sure one side will pick pro crypto while the other picks anti crypto because it's a totally divided system anymore where if one side says something the other has to imminently say the opposite just because. It doesn't even matter if it makes sense and it's freakin gross!

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is what it is. It is now a political hot topic meaning one side has to stake and claim while the other does the opposite. It is a back and forth game they play.

Unfortunately, it has real world consequences . This shows how little they care. Swat the letters around and it is still the same.

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha

0
0
0.000
avatar

I’m pretty skeptical on the various stances of this all. We could certainly be pro crypto but with a balance of cash, fiat and crypto. Removing something entirely in favor of crypto or cash is a foolish endeavor and one I think is going to be used to confuse and eventually hurt people. This feels like feigning resistance to crypto and then one day a switch will be flipped and they will then start to say they are getting rid of physical cash because “you all said you wanted crypto, well here it is!!” Type stuff. Very skeptical of this whole thing! Politics makes it even more sketchy.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Now we are shifting to another discussion but a valid one. I believe the goal is to get rid of cash, something that is happening by generational evolution. Younger people are not cash users. However, politicians still want that control. Here is where we get the difference between something like BTC or HBD and CBDC.

It isnt the digitization so much as who controls it. We know what the politicians want.

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha

0
0
0.000
avatar

I was under the impression that Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) was pretty pro-crypto, Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden of Oregon scaled back a tax provision on digital assets, Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) was working on legislation on stablecoins that seemed well received by the crypto industry, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) is hoping that crypto helps minorities in America who are unbanked and Eric Adams the Mayor of New York has been super pro-crypto for his state.

Since Fox has never, ever lied to its viewers then I guess we'll have to accept that US Democrats are anti-crypto.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Certainly, leaked reports should always be taken with a grain of salt. Fox lies just like the other mainstream media so it is sketchy to begin with.

That said, individuals of a party being one way does not mean the party platform is the opposite. And how many of those in Congress (3 out of the 4 named) have pushed back on Gensler and the Biden administration. For that matter, how many pushed back against the Trump admin which wasnt crypto friendly either?

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha

0
0
0.000
avatar

I honestly don't know and I'm not actually sure how I'd find that out. I saw that U.S. Senator John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) sent a letter to Gensler saying the SEC has a lack of regulatory clarity that leads to uneven enforcement of the crypto companies, but I don't know of other push back, or if the Democrats as a party are actually anti-crypto. They might be, but I don't know for sure at this point.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Democrats (especially in USA) are quite pro-bank, meaning that they are expected to do what they can not to enhance the crypto-impact.

Besides, when FTX went bankrupt, many relationships were discovered between the founder of FTX and Dems

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't think that's actually true. Some Democrats might be pro-bank, but there are many who are anti-large corporations (Bernie Sanders for example) who dislike how much control the banks have over business and that so many lower-income Americans are either unbanked or taken advantage of and constantly hit with overdraft fees.

I'm not sure where you heard Democrats are quite pro-bank but that doesn't seem accurate to me at all.

SBF clearly donated to Democrats during the 2022 Midterm Elections, that's clearly on record, but he also said that he donated the same amount to Republicans through shadow-donations because he didn't want journalists to know. I don't know if this is true or not because the transactions are not on record, but that's what he said.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, I see your point.

Dems should be less pro-corp than Reps but still a lot of them have huge interests towards the major financial system. That's why I am saying that. Not simply that Dems are pro-banks and Reps are not. Simply that all of them have huge connection with banks and corporations.

But I appreciate your feeback. I expressed myself in a poor way

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh no problem! You're doing amazingly given English is not your first language.

Unfortunately America allows corporations to donate to individual politicians, and political campaigns are often (but not always) won by the person who spent the most money, so we do see many politicians from Democrats, Republicans and Independents who become beholden to corporations because they need that continue flow of donations.

It's a terrible system that works against the American people.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes. This reminds me quite closely the marketing campaigns that companies run to get more exposure.
In this form, big companies are still investing money in politics-marketing. The more votes their candidate will get, the more power they will get.

Quite sick mechanism

0
0
0.000