Telsa Should Do A Capital Raise

avatar

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


There are a lot of calls for Tesla to do a stock buyback. This is the exact opposite of what it should do.

In this video I discuss how the company should do a capital raise by selling stock, As a car company, it is safe. However, if it is going to enter the AI/Robotics field, it is going to require a lot of capital.


▶️ 3Speak



0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar

but dont they already have a lot of money tho? have u seen sora O.O text to video ai

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep. There are a bunch rolling out. It is a true arms race.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes it makes me wonder if i can just start a youtube channel with all this text to ai stuff getting better lol

0
0
0.000
avatar

You could.

Or how about doing it for 3speak. Decline rewards since it is all AI generated but you could post the videos to both.

0
0
0.000
avatar

O.O maybe i would have to see how

0
0
0.000
avatar

I mean this Tesla of a company should rethink on their actions and how it might affect the public in terms of funds to purchase their products. Already they have more than enough and look where they are heading to...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @taskmaster4450le! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You published more than 3100 posts.
Your next target is to reach 3200 posts.
You received more than 660000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 670000 upvotes.
You made more than 125000 comments.
Your next target is to reach 130000 comments.
You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the month.
You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the week.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Check out our last posts:

Rebuilding HiveBuzz: The Challenges Towards Recovery
0
0
0.000
avatar

This makes sense. If they are also entering the AI/Robotics field, they will really need a lot of money. Currently, one of the biggest bottlenecks in AI is the processing power. Individuals can set up their own systems, but they are usually limited by their GPU. Companies are encountering the same but scaled up. I can't imagine how much processing power is needed by AI Sora to create their text to video results. With stronger computers, it can train on more data, and continue to improve its results.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Summary:
In this video, the speaker discusses the concept of a capital raise for Tesla, despite the company sitting on $30 billion. He highlights the need to address legal fees in Delaware before considering a capital raise, which could potentially lead to dilution and affect shareholders. The speaker emphasizes the importance of a capital raise due to Tesla's significant expenditures in artificial intelligence, neural networks, and machine learning. He mentions the OpenAI lawsuit and the need for deep pockets to fund such technologies. The speaker also points out the risks associated with relying solely on automotive profits to fund Tesla's operations, considering the cyclical nature of the industry. He suggests that transitioning from an automotive to an AI robotics company could benefit investors in the long run, although it may be a challenging decision in the short term.

Detailed Analysis:
The video centers around the topic of a potential capital raise for Tesla, an idea not widely discussed due to the company's substantial cash reserves of $30 billion. The speaker outlines a crucial preliminary step, which involves addressing legal fees related to a case in Delaware that requires $6 billion in stock as compensation. This hurdle needs to be resolved to prevent any negative impact on shareholders' sentiments due to potential dilution.

The speaker delves into the necessity of a capital raise despite Tesla's seemingly ample financial cushion. He underscores the company's hefty capital expenditure, particularly in cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence, neural networks, and machine learning. He draws attention to the costly nature of such ventures, alluding to the core issues in the OpenAI Elan lawsuit. The mention of OpenAI's for-profit shift and alignment with Microsoft highlights the immense financial resources required for ventures of this scale.

Moreover, the discussion shifts to Tesla's current reliance on profits from its automotive division, which constitute a significant portion of the company's earnings. The speaker raises concerns about the cyclical nature of the automotive industry, noting the unpredictability of future profitability and the potential contraction of margins. This consideration underscores the importance of diversifying Tesla's revenue streams to mitigate risks associated with industry fluctuations.

The speaker presents a compelling argument for transitioning from an automotive-centric company to one focused on AI robotics, citing a potentially larger Total Addressable Market (TAM) and increased company valuation. While acknowledging the short-term challenges and apprehensions among shareholders regarding such a shift, he emphasizes the long-term benefits that could accrue to investors. The speaker underscores the imperative for transparent communication from Tesla's leadership to effectively convey the rationale behind a capital raise and its anticipated positive outcomes for shareholders.

In conclusion, the video provides a thought-provoking analysis of the complexities and considerations surrounding a potential capital raise for Tesla, underscoring the necessity of strategic financial decisions to fuel innovation and sustain long-term growth in the rapidly evolving tech landscape.


Notice: This is an AI-generated summary based on a transcript of the video. The summarization of the videos in this channel was requested/approved by the channel owner.

0
0
0.000