The Massive Change Is Before Us

Technology is changing everything.

This is something that I preached about for a long time. Many years ago, I start my age of abundance posts/videos. It was done to bring light to the fact that technology was going to alter everything. We are on the cusp of a massive economic explosion, one that hasn't been seen in over 150 years.

Since we are at the onset of this, it is easy to deny it is happening. We have people telling us stuff like "technology always creates more jobs than it destroys" and "nothing in my daily life is really that different".

Unfortunately, these do not take into account the fact we are going to see massive convergence over the next couple decades. Advancements in both AI and robotics are going to dwarf anything we have seen over the last 50 years, including the personal computer.

For this reason, lets run through a few scenarios.


Source

Massive Job Destruction

We are likely seeing peak employment. While economists wrestling with their forecasts of whether we will have a soft landing or enter recession, the likelihood that unemployment goes up is a foregone conclusion. We will never see the numbers we do now simply because things are moving ahead at an incredible rate.

Robotics is starting to see massive progress. Ironically, whereas many thought the AI would be the delay, it is actually the mechanical components that are lagging. This is something that will be addressed over the next couple years.

What this means is we are going to see humanoid robots starts to emerge as legitimate replacements for humans. The last year introduced the world to LLMs. My guess is that, by the end of 2024, most will be aware of LBMs (large behavioral models). These are to robots what LLMs are to chatbots.

One of the key features in this was discovered by Tesla last year. The ability to train simply based upon video was an enormous breakthrough. This caused Tesla to scrap most of its code for its Full Self Driving software and go strictly to video training. After the initial step back, we are starting to see the results. This, of course, is not only being employed by Tesla.

Get ready for massive advancement. The difference with LBMs is that, once the system learns a skills, it is instantly employed in however many robots are made. This means one new skill could go to 100 or 100 million bots. Plus, we have a system that never goes backwards or "loses" a skill.

How can humans match up with that? We will see the number of tasks growing through the next couple years. Google is already contracting with many of the Fortune 50 companies to train the system on those companies data. This means the bots will already come packaged with the ability to performs the jobs required by those entities.

Calls For Government Sustenance

Whether we call it universal basic income or some other name, we are going to see calls over the next 10 years for governments to do something. Of course, we are already to the point where discussions should be taking place. Alas, humans being how they are will wait until it is a crisis.

Ideology and a host of other viewpoints will enter the conversation. While we cannot forecast how this will turn out, based upon history, we can surmise that governments will be:

A) too late
B) do too little

That means we are going to see some medium term pain in many areas. The futurists will cling to the notion that technology is going to create more jobs while millions are being put out of work.

Again, few are ready for the scale of a shift that could be taking place. When these systems are trained, the only question is how quickly the production scales. With advancements in manufacturing, we can bet there will be many companies that are rolling out the bots by the thousands. It was just reported that Tesla's auto factory in China pops out a car every 39 seconds. Imagine a humanoid robot being created at a similar pace. Then multiply that by a number of facilities (and companies) across the world.

By the way, manufacturing a robot is likely a more streamlined process than an automobile meaning the rate will probably be quicker.

Massive Economic Output

This might take 5 years from the start of scaling of production but we can expect economic output to skyrocket.

How much more productive is the world with 1 million humanoid robots? How about 10 million? 100 million?

Consider the fact the automotive industry can produce more than 90 million new vehicles in a year. In 2018, smartphone production hit 1.5 billion. I would say a robot is somewhere between a car and a smartphone.

Let us put this number at around 300 million. After a few years, you are talking 1 billion robots. How does that alter the workforce? Ultimately, it is going to bring abundance to much of the world.

Of course, jobs are going to be eliminated at a rapid rate hence the calls for UBI. Within a decade, we could see billions of robots in operation. The key is that each of these is able to feed more information back to the system. When one bot "learns" something, they all do.

Ultimately, this is the bridge from the digital to physical world. This means we are operating, at least in part, under the laws of information technology. In layman's terms that equates to things happening very quickly.

Do not buy into the notion that things will not change rapidly. The next half decade is going to be very telling.


What is Hive

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
15 comments
avatar

It cannot all happen fast enough in my perspective. We really have no idea what is right around the corner with AI in general. Especially given some of the breakthroughs that they are making in solving both mathematical and physics problems... that have long eluded even the most brightest human minds.

Exciting times!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah it is exciting.

I do not fear the Terminator scenario. What I do is in my latest article under my main account.

The siloed system if the digital world could be moving into the physical. The major tech companies are looking at controlling the means of production. That is scary.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, I gave that other post a read already. LOL the 'Terminator scenario' as you term it is laughable at best. Hmm yeah it does setup a scenario for centralized production but that has always been the case. Having a bunch of shady tech firms at the helm of it is disconcerting though.

0
0
0.000
avatar

To me, it proves why we have to keep pushing Web3.

It all starts with the data and this is where public blockchains enter. So few see this.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Mass Web3 adoption seems inevitable. I doubt it will be Hive but someone is going to 'nail it' and push it into the zeitgeist at some point.

Ultimately (as I have stated before) I think that the only way to ensure transparency and accountability with AI is via tying them to blockchain technology.

So many folks on here are snoozing on incorporating the available technologies into the Hive blockchain. Most of the focus seems to be on 'how to profit' instead of 'how to innovate' which is sad given the level of skill some of the developers have.

0
0
0.000
avatar

SingularityNet is already doing that. That is a blockchain designed for AI to be built on.

As for the snoozing, yeah I agree. There are not many who understand what is taking place. This is a race and it isnt against the banks.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for that I will look into them promptly.

It is a technology race like none other before... and it may well be the 'final one' (for a while) until quantum computing advances enough for mass adoption/deployment.

LOL the banks that have been 'bailed out' repeatedly... and who are floating only on the money being pumped into them by those whom cannot abide them failing.

Yeah, snoozing big time and no amount of debate/discussion (or shouting) about it all seems to penetrate.

0
0
0.000
avatar

so will these robots be able to clean houses o.o . that would be crazy or even cook would be interesting. a personal masterchef robot!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have a feeling that we will see domestic robots by the end of the decade.

So another 6 years, give or take a year or so, we will have them on the market.

Now what they will cost is another story.

0
0
0.000
avatar

thats fast ill still be under 40 that tie i wonder if i can buy one if its useful enough for me

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think solving the medium term pain caused by the massive change that is happening might soon become more of a priority. Many wouldn't be able to adapt and having that huge amount of people become redundant is probably something that we've experienced before.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think I agree with the author's analysis happening fast as many task are now been handled by bots,should i say this is a test of their inventories which will soon escalate to become a reality to all.from the recent happening of AI taking the place of photography and editing which has limited so many photographic editing skills,Bots carrying out trading task and to so many others.I think human should position themselves properly so as not to be slipped off by the new inventories coming up.
Thanks to @taskmaster4450le for this insight

0
0
0.000
avatar

It'll be Star Wars in no time where everyone has in-home droids!

once the system learns a skills, it is instantly employed in however many robots are made.

The ability to scale is unmatched when it comes to new skills. Like you said, the only thing slowing things down is the ability to build the robotics hardware. Good time to be a robotics manufacturer, bad time to be a blue collar laborer.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I would say the capabilities are going to be there within a couple of years. It will be like mobile phones when they first came out, only for the wealthy and the tech rather spotty.

But by the end of the decade, it might start to be commonplace.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Roaring 20s into a crushing worldwide recession at the turn of the decade. Where have I seen that before?

0
0
0.000