Why Technology Hasn't Taken Over And The Future

Why hasn't technology totally taken over? If we solved the self driving problem in 2003, why do we not have it today in spite of the industry spending somewhere around $75 billion (and growing)?

With all the advancement, how come the lives of most people are primarily the same?

This is what we are going to undertake in this article.

Technology Is Going Mainstream

Much of the answer to these questions lies in the fact that, so far, we are looking at niche markets.

Make no mistake, there was enormous disruption due to technology. The difference is that it was rather niche in its impact, delving into areas that, proportionately speaking, do not have that big an economic totality.

For example, notice how telecommunications changed. When was the last time you received a long distance phone bill? These are pretty much non-existent. This use to be an industry that was worth billions per year in billing.

What about music? Most people are not spending thousands of dollars on devices to play their music. Nor are most spending on the songs themselves. While there might be a subscription fee, that is it.

Again, we are dealing with an industry that was worth billions each year.

Let us toss up one more example: photography.

There was a time when we would have to buy special devices to take pictures. They were film, which had a cost. One the photos were taken, the film was developed (another cost). After dropping the film off, a day or two later we could pick up the physical pictures.

What was described is gone. It was also small potatoes.

As mentioned they were worth billions of dollars each year. Yet that is still minor compared to some other industries.

For example, look at the revenues from the global automotive industry.


Source

Here we are looking at something that generates around $2.5 trillion each year. Healthcare is another one. So is construction. These are industries that, once disrupted, will cause a massive shift.

This is why I say that, up to this point, most of what we are dealing with was niche market. The big stuff is still hanging out there.

Robotics And AI

This is a topic of frequent discussion and I think for good reason. There is a ton of activity taking place and, more importantly, progress being made.

We were able to see ChatGPT integrated into a robot so that it could handle some primitive conversation. This was a major break through and something we can expect to happen across the board.

NVIDIA also made headlines with its latest announcement of a line of bots that would basically system agnostic. They are looking at building the infrastructure that other platforms can stack upon.

My forecast is that we no longer be dealing with niche markets when it comes to technology. The major ones, i.e big dollars, are going to be disrupted like everything else. Here is where society will see a massive shift.

So what can we expect?

To start, this is going to be massively deflationary. Notice how the cost of music, communication, and video has come down. This will be repeated with energy, transportation, and food.

That is something that few discuss but one of the characteristics of technology is deflation. Ultimately, it pushes prices to either zero or near zero.

Just consider what happened to the cost of getting an article created. A chatbot can generate one that only requires a bit of editing in a few minutes, including the prompts.

Timing is difficult to judge since we have no idea how long it will take until we see humanoid robots entering production. By this, we are not talking a few hundred; that is still prototyping. Instead, we are looking at the time when a company decides it is going to work on production a few hundred thousand.

One that happens, we can presume the others will follow suit. This is not going to be a one (or even two) horse race. There will be a lot of companies involved, in many different capacities.

The other question is scaling. Getting to a couple hundred thousand could happen in under a year, or take five. If it is the latter, obviously the impact is slowed.

My guess is this is going to happen quicker than people think. I would not be surprised that, within 5 years, we will start setting forecasts (and they be reasonable) of when we will have 1 billion bots manufactured in a year. That is going to require automation throughout the entire robot supply chain something that could happen from the start.

The beginning stages will see industrial capacity explode. That is the first market in my opinion. As much as we love the idea of personal humanoid robots in our homes, I don't thing that will be the first market. The money is within industries. We are also seeing a shortage of workers in particular job segments, something that will likely be addressed first.

By the middle of the next decade, society will be completely revamped. It is unlikely that much is still the same. We are in the technological cycle where society sees massive impacts due to technology. We have not seen this since the 1980s and 1990s.

It is going to be a wild ride. Things are really starting to ramp up.


What Is Hive

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

By the middle of the next decade, society will be completely revamped.

I feel there has been a total revamp already in the Jobs industry with two things actually, 1st AI taking over human jobs and 2nd there is a trend for more remote work somehow that actually pays same or more amount of salaries like the 9 to 5 jobs gave. I think there will be more significant changes and that has something to do with VR/AR technology some how I feel there will be more development in this sector also other technological advancements as well.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You made a lot of good points. For me, I think the biggest 'hindrance' to technology has been regulations and safety. Full autopilot in cars has been difficult to implement and approve because of the risks involved. People are stupid, some devious. Until we can eliminate the risk of cars running over people, we won't see it a lot. For comparison, autopilot in planes have been in use for quite a while now. I'm hoping with more advanced AI, we can slowly get around these difficulties that we are facing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think a big difference is autopilot on a plane is pretty hazard-free, relatively speaking. There aren't thousands of datapoints per second coming at you from all angles. In the sky you are heading in the correct direction, correct speed, altitude etc. so the variables are much different. Still an amazing feat of technology and programming though, considering when it was implemented!

I think we just have to be careful who controls the AI. There are a lot of nefarious things that people like Gates, Soros and others do with regular people never mind if they have highly advanced AI at their fingertips.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree with your explanation of the difference between plane and car autopilot. If we can lessen the variables that cars need to process, that would also be helpful. An overpass can be helpful to limit humans crossing the road. A full replacement of cars to autonomous ones, can help limit driver related issues.

Policing AI usage is definitely something that needs some focus on. We don't want Skynet to become a reality.

0
0
0.000
avatar

See that’s where I fully disagree with you - I am not signing up for fully autonomous cars everywhere. If people want to buy them go ahead but everyone losing their ability to drive for any “greater good” is the absolute opposite. It eviscerates freedom of movement for people who have had the joy of that for the last 80 years or so. Don’t have the latest medical intervention? Sorry your car won’t work because you don’t have a steering wheel and the navigation is locked. That’s not a world I’m signing up for.

By the datapoints I am also meaning what these cars have already seen. Simply people walking around messes them up. Putting one of those self driving cars in rush hour street traffic in a big city like New York, Miami, Houston and you have hundreds of people walking around, crossing streets and lots of other things going on. It’s much different than a plane, and something they may eventually get better but it’s highly complex environmentally.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I guess you missed the part where I said to limit the people walking across the street. I can understand your reasons against autonomy. The simple solution will be to have manual lanes and auto lanes. I don't get the medical intervention part. I think that will happen to the manual driven cars instead of the auto ones.

0
0
0.000
avatar

What happened in Canada - they locked people out of their bank accounts and froze their assets because the truckers were protesting mandatory experimental injections to move about freely. If you think that is not going to continue to happen unless people collectively say NO then I hope you figure that out! I don’t try to spread doom and fear porn but this is their playbook. Mandatory medical interventions and if you don’t like it you get your freedoms taken away one by one.

Granted that’s if all of their dystopian ideas come true - I don’t think they will but that’s only because millions of people are rejecting their agendas.

Auto and manual lanes would make sense - kind of like the high occupancy vehicle lanes that many large American cities do for people commuting in. I just think the auto lanes would need to be protected so that it’s consistent and free of distractions.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh, that is next level type of control, and something I don't support. I don't even understand why they force it if it's just experimental.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Without a doubt. The control is the key.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The control is what they are vying to get as much and quickly as possible.

0
0
0.000
avatar

We will see the continued advancement in areas that are unregulated first. That is why I believe Hollywood and the broadcast industry is at risk in the near to medium term.

Nothing protecting it.

0
0
0.000