RE: Hive Five Years From Now

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

It cracks me up when I see that group trying to stop engagement and traffic on sites that require people to need RCs to post. Yet, that's the pain and beauty of decentralization.

I can disagree or agree, but in the end in DPOS it's the stake that is the tie breaker.

I find it best just to avoid those who are caught up in that struggle it's the same 12 people all of the time. Let's just make the encouraging voices louder.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

hive-167922 leofinance
0
0
0.000
3 comments
avatar
(Edited)

The RC system is one of our best inventions . It's incredible. Those who deserve to have RC do. And people upvote them. I've yet to see someone lacking communication and ability to speak freely due to RC credits .

Edit: if the stake is the tie breaker;

Specifically what about stake is bad/wrong/broken and how can we modify change and or remove stake to better hive economic/governance/communication? (links to all three?)

I think we could have a visual stake system more than a number based.

Convert the word stake into light. How much light do you have in hive

(00000077000000) would be different than. (0000000000836399000000000)

Text value would show one and the user would literally see an orb of light / hues / size , in perspective of the systems they are connecting with. Be it economic, governance , or communication . Bad light or color , maybe , would prevent bad economic connections.

Not completely moving hive not away from crypto values and dollars as it can be layered on top of HBD and the other systems involved . Lightwave/Color Economics adds to theses systems

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I also like the RCs system. My point was as people need more RCs they need Hive. If you aren't selling to the end user, and Hive isn't really, they are wanting the apps to market. Then you are selling RCs and that requires traffic.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply