The Latin American Report # 24: A special edition on inmigration

avatar



Original Source (Edited with Canva)

As expected, the Twitter timeline has been very hot in the last hours around the immigration debate in the United States, with the definitive expiration of the controversial health order of the Trump administration anchored in Title 42 of the United States Code. We will talk about regulations and decisions adopted "outside" the region, but which have everything to do with it, from the analysis of the reasons that make migrants abandon their homeland —including sure those beyond the expectations of economic growth—, and the commitment that the U.S. should have in this regard from two dimensions: 1) the level of aid it allocates annually to the region (quite insufficient), to make more opportunities available to ordinary people for a better and sound life; and 2) the treatment it gives to irregular migrants at the border.

American authorities have been trying since January to prepare for the consequences of this event, and they have been very clear in spreading the message that the border will not be open to irregular migration. But with the migrant's imperative need, and a much greater reach of misinformation networks run by coyotes and smugglers, who are closer to these desperate people, the expected course was a strong flood at the southern border for the days and weeks to come.

How the Biden administration is reacting to this challenge?

The White House will again handle the immigration issue by appealing to Title 8 of the Code, specifically focused on the topic, but updated with tough measures for discouraging irregular migration.

Homeland Security Sec. Mayorkas says the "large numbers" of migrants at the southern border are creating "an incredible strain" on resources ahead of Title 42 ending.

"Our borders are not open. People who cross our border unlawfully...will be promptly processed and removed." pic.twitter.com/SilhyOw3L9

— CBS News (@CBSNews) May 11, 2023

As of yesterday, a person arriving at the southern border will be presumptively ineligible for asylum, and, unlike the zero prosecution possibilities offered to the government by the Title 42 regulation, the application of Title 8 carries with some such as a ban on entry into the United States for a minimum of five years and, if violated, could tentatively face charges there. According to Mayorkas' statements to the press from the classic James S. Brady Press Briefing Room, 24,000 Border Patrol agents and other personnel were called in to deal with the emergency, based on the projection they have made and the significant increase seen in the number of encounters in some areas of the border (as stated on Tuesday, a good part of those involved are Venezuelan).


Title 42 Order vs. Title 8 Enforcement Consequences Graphic. Photo by U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Source).

In the hours leading up to the expiration of Title 42, the administration secured Mexico's agreement to continue to receive —for the first time under Title 8 authority— Cuban, Venezuelan, Nicaraguan, and Haitian migrants not admitted. These, on the other hand, have the possibility of continuing to appeal to the humanitarian parole that monthly guarantees some 30,000 of them to arrive in the United States and remain and work legally there for two years (with the handicap that they must have a sponsor, which favors migrants with better-established family members).


Latin American families crossing "Río Grande" seeking US soil. Credit: Getty Images / Joe Raedle. Photo obtained via Twitter.

Another step was to expand the use of the CBPOne mobile application for migrants in central and northern Mexico as the official way to schedule an appointment and present themselves in a planned manner at a port of entry, for introducing their asylum case. In this new context, the intention is to offer 1000 daily slots, which remains a lottery for an infinite demand of individuals who try unsuccessfully for months even to book. New parole processes for family reunification were also introduced and oriented to El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Colombia, updating those in place for Cuba and Haiti.

The new rule from the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice

The referred agencies introduced changes effective May 12 to certain sections they administer in the Code of Federal Regulations (8 CFR Parts 208, 1003, and 1208), which contain references to Title 8 of the U.S. Code. One thing I have learned after years of following the politics from the Oval Office is that we can't just go by statements, which often appeal to a rhetoric that is then somehow negated in the specific regulations that are issued, which are what ultimately guide governmental action.

Often called the ‘train of death,’ for many migrants, this days-long journey is the only shot they have at making it to the U.S.-Mexico border. Here’s a glimpse at their experience.

(warning: distressing) pic.twitter.com/Mf1NhTMp9q

— NowThis (@nowthisnews) May 13, 2023

So, this case is no different. The "fine print" of the amendments and additions to the CFR still leaves an opportunity, a hope for the irregular migrant, even if they fail to rebut the presumption of ineligibility that will apply to all those crossing the border without documentation that qualifies them for legal admission.


6PI4LjA9.jpeg
Hundreds gather in Colombia, at the very beginning of the deadly trip through the Darién Gap, en route to Panamá, dreaming to reach the U.S. (Source).

The exceptions to the presumption of ineligibility are as follows:

  • The alien was an unaccompanied child; and

  • The alien or a member of the alien’s family also traveling: 1) was authorized to arrive and seek parole; 2) presented at a port of entry, under a pre-scheduled time and place (via CBPOne), or if the alien strongly demonstrates that it was not possible to use CBPOne because of language barrier, illiteracy, relevant technical failure, and other issues; or 3) sought asylum in a third country and was denied the benefit.

To rebut the presumption of ineligibility, the migrant or a member of the family also arriving must meet one of the following three criteria:

  • Faced an acute medical emergency;

  • Faced an extreme and imminent threat to their life or safety, such as an imminent threat of rape, kidnapping, torture, or murder; or

  • Were a victim of a severe form of trafficking, as defined in 8 CFR § 214.11.



An Immigration Detainer form taken at a detention facility (Credit: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Public Domain, Source).

If the migrant fails to rebut the presumption of ineligibility, the asylum officer in charge will record a negative credible fear determination, and then assess whether the migrant may be subject to persecution —on account of race, religion, nationality, adherence to a particular social group, and political opinion— or torture in the country to which he or she is likely to be returned. If positive, DHS will issue a Form I-862, Notice to Appear. If not, a written decision will be delivered, which can still be reviewed if the alien so desires with an immigration judge, who will validate the asylum officer's findings.

What's happening and what can we expect?

Almost 48 hours after the order expired, the sharp increase in arrivals at the southern border did not occur, to the benefit of the administration, although people continue the effort coming from Venezuela, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras, Ecuador, Cuba, Mexico, and Nicaragua mainly because they still believe they will qualify somehow. They are not without reason, from the economic perspective —which above all defines Cuban emigration, although it has nothing to do with the asylum application process—, to that of security, which I see very accentuated for example in Ecuador, with several cases reporting that they leave the country to flee the deadly extortions of the gangs there (others bring their evidence on skin, like Lupita).

Now Mexico is denying the documentation it used to give migrants to stay there for 30 days, which they used to reach north. It is one more obstacle, but we will see how much it will discourage. South of "America" things have probably never been worse in the last twenty years, and only a concentrated and integral effort tackling the roots of this migration crisis, which are also historical, will restore dignity. Thank you for reading this far, and I wish you an excellent day, especially to all mothers on this special Sunday. See you next time!



Edited with Canva.



0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar

Congratulations @limonta! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You published more than 60 posts.
Your next target is to reach 70 posts.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Check out our last posts:

LEO Power Up Day - May 15, 2023
The Hive Gamification Proposal
0
0
0.000
avatar

As a Latin American and Venezuelan, the issue of the migration of billions of people from this region of the world touches me personally. Not because of my own experience, but because of family, friends and even acquaintances who have had to do so for different reasons... I really appreciate your report on the situation, my friend. Excellent work. @limonta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Buenas noches Jesús. Vamos a hablar un poquito en nuestro idioma natural, que aquí en esta comunidad no hay problema con ello (no publico en español porque generalmente suele haber muy poco feedback). Me pasa lo mismo con el tema, que tiene muchísimas y complejas aristas, y en tal sentido trato de ser lo más objetivo posible, tratando de no herir sensibilidades. Te agradezco sobremanera la retroalimentación. Un abrazo desde Cuba.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Perfectamente podemos hacerlo. Es más, podrías pasarte un instante por mi más reciente artículo en esta comunidad y quizá halles varias cosas, que seguramente has vivido de primera mano en tu país, Cuba. Te recomiendo encarecidamente que lo hagas. Y que, si no es demasiada exigencia, posteriormente comentaras tu parecer. PD: puedes tutearme. Lo formalismos, aunque abrumadoramente entendidos como señal de "buena educación" para la intelectualidad y el correcto debate, son imprácticos, y el mi opinión, innecesarios. Un saludos grande, genio, @limonta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Muchísimas gracias mano!! Ya paso por tu post.

0
0
0.000