¡I warn you! You prolly would never think I would write and share a post like this.

avatar
(Edited)

«-Master of Tasks «-» Greatest Money Lover-»

TaskMaster

Perhaps you already know pretty well who's the user and the blockchain's username behind this funny kitty above. Yeah! s/he likes all kinds & sorts of yummy muffins and big sweet cakes. But seems like s/he never lights that little red candle, so that s/he won't have to invest in another one when s/he receives many more of those delicacies that brighten her/his sweet tooth palate everyday.

This blond kitty has been wandering over here collecting muffins & cakes for 36 moons already. Yeah! since August 2017. And I bet s/he hasn't lit that little candle even once in all this time. S/he is definitely very thrifty.

You might be surprised that this above is just one of her/his many catlike identities on the blockchain. Stealthy, chary, silent, watchful and highly cautious personalities. Though, I think this above is her/his main one.

He (or maybe she) certainly has, watches and takes good care of his small litter of feline puppies throughout the blockchain. And just by these great attributes, I am more inclined to think that because of this very maternal, thrifty and prosperous behavior this user rather must be a She than a He.

But yeah, we can all be wrong from time to time.

Without go deeper inside the rabbit hole, all I found out so far has been a handful of his first generation most cherished puppies for breastfeeding.

They go all with the fond nicknames at the end of their junior usernames as DP, LE & PA. And then, another one more. One with a nickname a little bit more felinely gattino. The three young juniors mostly as her/his json & curation warriors and the last one using the main account as her/his voting proxy. There you go. Everything stays with the family.

This last cub which seems to be the wiser of the bunch. And prolly the one enjoying of his/her highest appreciation and confidence to inherit and quietly handle the bags of mony in a near future. The apparently smarter and furtively more skilfull from her/his own breed

A pity that this cub got a nasty stalker long time ago annoying him/her all the time when s/he is posting something sporty on the blockchain.

Well yeah. I have nothing against this user. Nor personally nor otherwise. I just find her/his behavior pretty unique and her/his 'social' performance on both blockchains quite peculiar compared with everyone else here on this sort of content monetizing platforms.

As a matter of fact, I reckon we could learn one or two very useful things about economy, finances and about how to save, accumulate, hoard and store money on the blockchain for a next future after this pandemic solely following her/his dexterous and skilful example.

I could say that I can see her/his approach as highly pragmatic, pretty wise and even cleverly appropiated in order to have to deal daily with a bunch of illustrious unknowns online that we might well won't see anymore again at any moment. ¿Who pays more and better? ¡NOW!

Oh yeah! All this despite of what many times I perceive from her/him as a kinda stingy and selfish social endeavor with many clear nuances of plain conservative elitism. Preference and favoritism to pick mostly the opulents to mingle with. And pure snobism at the time to choose with whom s/he is gonna interact with the most. And especially and above all, with whom the heck s/he will distribute more generously the tokens inside the collective rewards pool with what s/he is allowed to spread and share these from it.

S/he is followed by a bunch of the biggest whales and most wealthy trails and guilds on both blockchains. And each one of her/his daily good articles always has been consistently and handsomely well upvoted all the time by them. BUT... and this is a big but here.

But if it were not that s/he chooses to upvote the content of others (posts, comments, whatever) with a VP with percentages as ridiculously low as those s/he is used to reward the effort of other users in the blockchain.

Maybe, just maybe, s/he would have passed under my radar without penalty nor glory and most likely would not have deserved a full article of my outlandish inspiration to highlight her/his remarkable qualities.

¡Just look at this!

¡Holy crap! Come on pal!

Don't you feel remorse? Do you find this 'mathematical aberration' fair and socially acceptable within a community? Well, I don't find this fair.

Last but not least...

Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just a very curious MoFo who out of some boredom in a slow hot Sunday of social distancing and quarantine alone at home watching the poor interaction in our blockchains today. All of the sudden, I decided to snoop a bit deeper on these social matters around.

And merrily enough, it ocurred to me to share these odd facts here in my blog with the intention to know your opinions in case you'll be so brave to comment. Well yeah, daring to say something at all. You know?

Just take my views here on this issue as simply a harmless game to play the role of a Devil's Advocate with a slight frolicly naughty slant. As always, you are entitled to your own opinions too. And you certainly can smear them everywhere as you see fit. Go ahead! Pull my tongue! Please make my day.

Leave a comment. Share your experiences and feedback. ¡Be part of the conversation!

«««-$-»»»

"Follows, Comments, Resteems & Upvotes will be highly appreciated"

Cranky Gandalf

Cheers!!



0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar

"And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel."(Mark 1:15)

Question from the Bible, Do you believe that the Bible is the complete and final word of God? [Part 1 of 4]

Watch the Video below to know the Answer...
(Sorry for sending this comment. We are not looking for our self profit, our intentions is to preach the words of God in any means possible.)


Comment what you understand of our Youtube Video to receive our full votes. We have 30,000 #HivePower, It's our little way to Thank you, our beloved friend.
Check our Discord Chat
Join our Official Community: https://peakd.com/c/hive-182074/created

0
0
0.000
avatar

How I dream for a .12% upvote!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hahahaha and me too. :D

I believe that in almost 4 years that I've been messing with everyone over here, I can't recall have ever received one upvote so low, ludicrous and rickety like these s/he use to grant only to a very few of her/his favorites, priviledged and well selected ones.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great post my friend. Glad to see people paying attention to what is taking place on here.

So what is your issue? The fact that upvotes are given in small quantities? do you not feel that is acceptable? Are you claiming that I am falling down on spreading the wealth?

Isn't it interesting that small votes add up. You will notice that my upvotes given rank me #48 on here.

voting.png

As you will see my voting power is consistently between 80%-90%

votingpwer.png

Of course there is the fact that I have fairly decent sized delegations out to OCDB, Tipu, and Actifit, all whom upvote a wide variety of users.

Or perhaps you would prefer I upvote only a few accounts with maximum weight? Do you think that is best for the system?

Posted Using LeoFinance

0
0
0.000
avatar

OP seems to be butthurt over nothing. Keep doing what you're doing and ignore the trolls

Posted Using LeoFinance

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hey! Hi there @nealmcspadden. :)

I have no doubt you are confused and have the concept of what's a troll totally wrong buddy.

¿Butthurt? haha, another mistake bro. As an elder, I have no butt whatsoever since long time ago. };)

By the way. I hope you don't mind if I grant you a commenter diploma to celebrate the occasion of this pretty rare appearance and intervention in one of my posts.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

So what is your issue? The fact that upvotes are given in small quantities?

Certainly!! Small quantities with embarrassingly low voting percentages is my issue.

do you not feel that is acceptable?

Oh no! of course I feel it's more than acceptable. From your viewpoint, obviously.

Are you claiming that I am falling down on spreading the wealth?

Not even in the least.

Ah! @taskmaster4450, you are smarter than that to know better mate.

How wouldn't you be in the #48 position in the upvotes rankings giving those embarrassingly low voting percentages?

Sheesh buddy! if I followed your 'solidarity' voting example, I could easily leave to you, cheetah and steemitboard eating shit in the gutter watching me eating grapes with a laurel wreath on my head in the first position in that ranking if I wanted.

I'm not critizising you at all my friend. On the contrary, I'm praising your incomparable and fantastic ability to "curate" content and accumulate money exclusively in your own wallet by distributing such humongous amount of lousy low percentage upvotes. Hence, the "Greatest Money Lover" remark above.

Ok, let's quickly check deeper the validity of those general ranking statistics that you are presenting as your defense. Let's just compare against yours the percentage of vote that each of your neighbors in that ranking (#47 & #49) has each one adjusted each time they grant an upvote.

Of course there is the fact that I have fairly decent sized delegations out to OCDB, Tipu, and Actifit, all whom upvote a wide variety of users.

Worthy of applauding. as for distributing and spread further your upvotes.

If only these upvotes were not granted blindly. And your delegations were not getting you daily dividends. And if you couldn't see not even a mere cent from curation rewards through their work. Your philanthropic activity certainly would be of maximum encomium & appraisal.

Or perhaps you would prefer I upvote only a few accounts with maximum weight? Do you think that is best for the system?

Again. I think you are indeed pretty smart and witty at the moment to scatter your personal wealth throughout the system and unfailingly milk and obtain for yourself the maximum financial benefit through your strategy.

All of that is commendable. And that is precisely what my post is about. Just refrain from casting votes for content that you actually read with such ridiculously low voting percentages and I'm fine with that. That's all. :)

0
0
0.000
avatar

So you are saying there is a difference between spreading the daily 15%-20% daily voting power over a larger number of accounts as opposed to go with very few?

Yes the amount of each vote is higher under the former but fewer accounts supported.

In the end, the voting power is utilized and the upvotes passed out.

As for this, it is obvious you do not know how things work.

On the contrary, I'm praising your incomparable and fantastic ability to "curate" content and accumulate money exclusively in your own wallet by distributing such humongous amount of lousy low percentage upvotes. Hence, the "Greatest Money Lover" remark above.

If anything my total curation is lowered since I am voting in smaller percentages, most of them posts that do not earn a lot of money. I would earn more if I simply upvoted ten posts that earn over 20 HIVE.

Posted Using LeoFinance

0
0
0.000
avatar

So you are saying there is a difference between spreading the daily 15%-20% daily voting power over a larger number of accounts as opposed to go with very few?

Nope, what I'm saying is: Recalculate how low the percentage to adjust in your voting power should be and the maximum number of votes that you could execute daily according your SP/HP that would grant at least freaking $0.01 cents. Less than that, better let them hatch.

In the end, the voting power is utilized and the upvotes passed out.

No need to pass out upvotes whatsoever if these can't grant rewards above the dust voting treshold at least. Be sure to grant no less than $0.02 on each of your freaken upvotes.

As for this, it is obvious you do not know how things work.

There is nothing to know about or understand how things work here mate. Financially and socially speaking, I am absolutely sure that casting under $0.01 upvotes to anyone having the possibility to grant at least that minimum treshold of rewards, is utterly stupid and useless for everyone.

If anything my total curation is lowered since I am voting in smaller percentages, most of them posts that do not earn a lot of money. I would earn more if I simply upvoted ten posts that earn over 20 HIVE.

You see? That's exactly what I'm saying. Then, ¿Why the heck spread those useless and stupid fractional low percentages votes around? For whose benefit?

0
0
0.000