RE: Hive Will Thrive When We Do Not Focus Upon HIVE

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

i still wanna read the rest of your post as gawd it looks detailed. First wanted to ask about this:

To start, it is vital that HIVE always maintain a reward pool for content. The staking of the token plays into governance operations such as Witness voting, thus it needs to be as accessible as possible. Rewarding content helps to spread the distribution of the token out. Ultimately, we need to see millions of accounts holding HP.

HIVE reward pool remains a little more accessible via more HIVE in escrow with the hive dao. Previously this same amount existed as STEEM that was ninja-mined (aka owned by steemit inc and premined by them) so HIVE forked out this ninja-mined stake (presumably by forking out the user/s that held the ninjamine funds in their wallets?) and in turn escrowed the equivalent amount of STEEM owners of those account to keep them in a HIVE dao.

Am I correct or way off the mark? hard to keep up with all this blockchainsplaining sometimes, is all.

My question is this - is the escrowed HIVE going to provide enough of a benefit where HIVE is being equalised in distribution? From the outset of HIVE hf, there was no equality in distrubtion or equal accessibility from what I experienced. The same heavy bag holders on STEEM (well some of them) had an airdropped Lion's share of HIVE from the outset of HIVE hf too.

it needs to be as accessible as possible. Capital accumulates easiest and quickest by those that have the most so there will be limited or no, equal accessibility.

That's me being a Marxist, I thought I'd try it out for a change, no harm intended just havin' a Josh
Jolly good show, ta ta!

facestageTAYTAY.png



0
0
0.000
0 comments