Ambulance chasing retard.

Lawyers have a saying..
"When we win we win, When they lose we win"
I'm kidding I made that up.
That's the reality though.
I'm not at all a legal expert but from point of lawyers (which are soulless).. sure it's got novelty and potential for big publicity.
My opinion is based on the state of society.
Crypto is mainly a boy's toy.
Crytpo is the wild west and needs regulation.
Platforms are digging in on the control of information.
Governments are too (despite pretending to go against platforms).
It would be difficult to prove there was truly malicious intent when a platform can claim they acted in the interest of public. Those that lost a lot could then reform but it's hard to be victim in a new money industry with bad reputation and filled with shady actors. It's done more damage to itself than the cancellation of ad campaigns.
Self regulation is what it needs before it seeks sympathy.
Players within the industry should be calling out those bad actors.
Show that you really care about the true victims.
The ones who fall for the WHEN MOON/LAMBO and put in their few dollars thinking this is that "financial solution" that it's promised as.

Low RC
Bck L8r..

Ambulance chasing retard.

Ambulance chasing retard.

I don't see the outcome you all desire because ultimately the defence will be, since it's an unregulated industry. The platforms acted in the interest of public. That will then mean no class action in defence of whole crypto community. The argument of unfair business practice can continue to exist. From there a case of prominent businesses that DID suffer (can be proven) can proceed. This is in effect already in some countries. I'm sure you are aware of the lawyer case against a damaging review left on Google. Ruling in this regards DOES HOLD in the legal system.
TO prove that They acted maliciously exclusively though is what cannot be proven within the legal system. Crypto really destroyed it's reputation when the wild west became it,, with the ICO madness that YOU yourself accept as damaging. The other major hurdle is that currently there is still shady entities running questionable projects. MLM seems to have even become the default system here for recruiting users. The promise of referral rewards is not a good look and only attracts poor.
Appics for instance is a project which really died long ago but they continue to try to market the same "test app" that they've had for over 3 years. They have a pay gateway to take money for a token which is in Beta.. and that is completely illegal. They know it.
This is why this crypto world has no real MASS ADOPTION FUTURE.
Just Sharks coming up with new ways to take money from the foolish.
IF this was truly DECENTRALISED.. then people would and should be calling out bad actors, because it only hurts everyone in the long run. Yet everyone is nose deep into their own money game and don't think at at all how the bad is hurting their own endeavour.
Anyway I was going to do an elaborate, much more professionally presented opinion but really what do I care. You all are the ones committed to this. Both in time and in money. You WILL need to address those issues and many more though.. because at some point you got to ask.. "If this is so good.. why the hell is it failing?"
I don't see HIVE existing as that thing bloktrades and theycallhimdan keep believing will happen.
Proposals out the wazoo and again.. all thinking the MLM model is the solution.

@themarkymark Isn't it time Bernie was added to your global blacklist. This is abuse.