RE: Why Dorsey Doesn't Want Decentralized Social Media

Well i think what you all miss alot in your view of Jack Dorsey is that he's bound by fidicuary responsibility to shareholders and some legal things go with that. I'm not saying you all are wrong about Jack Dorsey being part of that system as he created Twitter he has to be now in that he's got all these people put all their money behind him.

My problem with the targeting is that why aren't you saying the same things about these guys as you stated how they were here.

"Have you ever seen Charles Hoskinson, Vitalik, or even Dan Larimer reading from a script?"

Okay sure but why aren't they supporting Steem or Hive? Shouldn't we first be asking the biggest influencers in crypto to support decentralized social media. When they are promoting or getting info out why aren't they using decentralized social media? Is what i'm asking?

I just find it odd we keep saying what business people who took shareholder money and are now obligated to give them their money back.. I find it weird that we're not going hey Vitalik .. why don't you speak well of us. Charles and even Dan larimer who yes they occassionaly may say a few kind words but why is that as far as it goes knowing the gravity of decentralized social media?

Isn't it that they depend mostly solely on mainstream social media to get their info out? So why is it we gotta go after Jack Dorsey where is there responsbility to this? I don't wanna get into the shortcomings of what happens on dpos systems i would assume they are aware of that. Evenso is even imperfect dpos systems worse than centralized.. account banning let you all tell it.. circumstances? Would'nt even imperfect dpos be a better option than that. So i'd be a bit interested in why thats not the case. Why more crypto people haven't defended and spoke well of steem or hive to the point they should be pushed to the top 10.. That's not what seems to happen though. I'd be interested in the reasons why?

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta