RE: Are we at a point where our curation no longer matter. +Pobpunks update
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
#POB is just getting a new breath of life, super exciting. Big up for sharing your point of view!
Great example for the exclusionary tag update too:
We definitely want to see more of this content, raw and honest. Let's say that Neoxian falls into the general tribe criteria.
How would you feel about receiving an automated comment at the time of publishing which let you know about the potential for tag spam?
Obviously, I know it isn't to tag spam (because I know your position on it already for the most part), it looks like you are actively part of the tribe and not looking for a token handout. It's got me thinking about the number of tags used, the amount of general tribe tags used, and the order of the tags (chronologic).
Thinking out loud I guess, lol. Trying to point out some grey area examples that are important to address as they're going to be the authors/creators that we want to support and not piss off.
I think creators should be free to post in any community we feel like and if the community don't like it then they should give a clear warning about tag abuse and wait for a response from the writer. If not response then mute. I had it happen to me for posting non-finance stuff on a finance tag. Later I made amends with the community. Considering any offence such as tag spam it is good to examine the motive of the violator and any question should be freely directed towards the author. vyb and pob basically allow any type of publication but I wish I could find more content or at least sincere content.
I like what jaxsonmurph is doing here and would like to see more of this kind of community initiative. That reminds me... I should buy up some more of his NFTs.
After reading that Post about the exclusionary tag update, you make a valid point which I will also be addressing with my own tag usage going forward, to lead by example for others that want to see these changes work to improve the communities/tribes.
An automated comment would be a good way to remind creators of the potential of tag abuse and should make authors more aware when they are doing this, the odd time you would understand, but afterwards it would become clear if users are clearly abusing tags.
I could see this as something that could work, if that's something that was to be implemented to make the tribe stronger.
I do also understand the point of view that @mineopoly shared in the comments about creators being free to post in any community and if a community member has an issue they could comment as such and if not replied too, they could be muted which opens up a discussion on how something could be implemented by community consensus that would reduce unnecessary tag abuse.
In a way that wouldn't piss off those we want to support
You've both got the right idea, discuss and discover 😀
Like I've mentioned before in another comment, the decision to add exclusionary tags is not an irreversible move, so it's not something to get overly bent out of shape about. The automated comment to show the framework is going to be an important one.
Let me ask... how would you feel about a 5 tag limit on your post (on the vybrainium front-end? Also, keep in mind that POB, proofofbrain, and hive-150329 tags are going to be added to the VYB smart contract so that VYB is earned when these tags are used as well.
@mineopoly is getting tagged here as well because it's 8am Monday morning and as much as the drum and bass is getting me rolling, I'm still in half-asleep mode 😂